Jump to content

Revell's new tool hurricane?


misha71

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, dennismcc said:

Really jealous Max, I watched a programme on the building of a two seater Hurricane (Warbird Workshop) and it was fascinating as well as a change from two seater Spitfires, as they said it was the only one it must be the one you are going up in BE505 ?

 

Cheers

 

Dennis

Indeed Dennis:

 

Ky4Ixv.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Marcleon said:

No Frightenings left flying unfortunately in South Africa, the airframes here are in a sorry state. Don't think there are tyres left anyway.... Regards, Marc.

Oh dear, that’s so sad Marc. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the discussions about Hurricane vs Spitfire one other factor that has to be considered is "manufacturing." The Hurricane was very complex, with a mix of metal, wood and fabric, all of which required specialised tools, skills and labour, which in turn made it more expensive than the all-metal Spitfire. The parts count for the tubular fuselage structure of the Hurricane far exceeded the parts count for the Spitfire fuselage, not to mention that the Hurricane fuselage was part metalwork and part cabinet-making. For that reason, the Spitfire was easier and cheaper to produce. The all-metal successor of the Hurricane was the (failed) Tornado, which eventually led to the Typhoon and then the Tempest.  Yet, the Typhoon and the Tempest continued to be very complex designs with their very intricate tubular internal frame (a leftover of WW1 and inter-war aicraft design) compared to the much simpler and streamlined Spitfire. That simplicity of the Spitfire was what made it so versatile and long-lasting. 

Having said all that, I still love the Hurricane more than the Spitfire. :D

Radu 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s precisely for the same reasons that I like the Hurricane so much when I built the 1/32 Fly model.

From a modeller’s point of vue, the Hurricane has a lot to offer: different camouflages, theaters of operation, nationalities,… while the Spitfire MK.I is a one-trick pony.

Of course YMMV ;)

Quang

 

Edited by quang
Syntax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Radub said:

The all-metal successor of the Hurricane was the (failed) Tornado, which eventually led to the Typhoon and then the Tempest.  Yet, the Typhoon and the Tempest continued to be very complex designs with their very intricate tubular internal frame (a leftover of WW1 and inter-war aicraft design) compared to the much simpler and streamlined Spitfire. That simplicity of the Spitfire was what made it so versatile and long-lasting. 

Having said all that, I still love the Hurricane more than the Spitfire. :D

Radu 


Just to be correct, the Tornado was one of two parallel Hurricane replacements that Hawker was developing, specifically the 'R' design for the RR Vulture. The 'N' design that was developed alongside it for the Napier Sabre became the Typhoon. The Typhoon only flew 4 months after the Tornado due to development issues with the Sabre engine, something which would plague the Typhoon program.

Note these aircraft were much earlier than most folks realize, with design work starting in 1937 and the Tornado first flying in Oct 1939, followed by the Typhoon in Feb 1940. Both designs were largely settled by the time the challenges with Hawker-style construction became evident.

One wonders what would have happened if RR had not killed the Vulture program after the Manchester fiasco, effectively killing the Tornado, as the Vulture had been trouble-free in the Tornado unlike the Sabre in the Typhoon. The Tornado was never a failed design, in fact it was quite trouble-free in development unlike the Typhoon.

Edited by Adam Maas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...