Dave Roof
-
Posts
853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Dave Roof
-
-
-
-
Third test print showed an almost perfect fit, so adding the details has begun. There is still a lot more to do, but it's getting there.
- Kagemusha, Rockie Yarwood, Scotsman and 6 others
-
9
-
While there is still quite a bit of work to do, the initial test prints show the part fits as it should. As I type this, a third test print is in progress with changes that should provide an even better fit and fix a couple minor distortion issues.
Once I am satisfied with the fit of the part, all of the details will be added. This will include panel lines, rivets and fasteners, as well as the cameras and other items. The forward nose landing gear doors and forward bulkhead of the wheel well also need to be done. If all goes as planned, I hope to have this released by mid April.........finally!
- johncrow, Rockie Yarwood, Smokey and 5 others
-
8
-
Gentlemen,
This sheet will be sent to Microscale for a quote within the next few days. Retail will be $20 and we hope to have it ready to ship within the next several weeks.
- Starfighter Jock, Jan_G, Zola25 and 6 others
-
9
-
-
**Edit - added a third option based on the noted suggestion
Gentlemen,
Looking for your input. Now, please keep in mind I am only asking for input for modern jets at the moment.
Given three options, which of these would you prefer :
Option 1 : 5.5 x 8.5 inch sheet with ONE marking option, but everything needed to build that one jet (required maintenance data included). Retail would be somewhere between $10 and $15
Option 2 : 8.5 x 11 inch sheet with 3 to 6 options, but only the primary squadron markings (you would need to source maintenance data markings from the kit or another source). Retail would be somewhere between $15 and $20
Option 3 : 8.5 x 11 inch sheet with 2 (possibly 3) options and the required maintenance data markings for one. Retail would be somewhere between $15 and $20
Thoughts?
-
16 minutes ago, thierry laurent said:
Well, it is not a weld seam but there is a seam filled with something: silicone? And in scale, this really looks like a weld even if I'm agreeing another wording should be used.
Yes, that is just a sealant.
-
3 minutes ago, thierry laurent said:
Hi Dave,
If you look at your picture, what is the line close to the screw heads on the top of the pylon...?
Thierry
It's the natural line of the two halves held together by those screws. They're not welded together as that would make removing the suspension unit inside nearly impossible. Pretty much the same set up on the AH-1W :
-
I didn't get through all of it, but this is incorrect. There is no weld seam. The pylon consists of two halves that enclose the suspension rack, held together by screws. The seam shouldn't even be filled. The only areas that should have the seam filled and sanded smooth are the forward and aft fairings of the pylons.
· The seam between both halves of the wing external pylons (A3-A6 & A4-A5) ask for some time-consuming sanding without damaging the top features. However, look closely at the full-scale pylon and you will see that there is a weld seam on the central section. So, if you fully remove the seam, consider recreating the weld with very thing plastic stretched sprue.
-
19 minutes ago, jwest21 said:
So if one was to build a Ukranian MiG-29, which variant is correct? The A or the C or both? TIme frame for the plane I want to build is whatever is current.
Both would be correct depending on time frame. From what I've gathered, they're currently flying MiG-29MU1, which is basically a MiG-29C with internal upgrades. Admittedly not at all knowledgeable on any MiG aircraft, so you may want to research more.
-
Iraq invades Kuwait
Modelers building Kuwaiti and coalition equipment in group builds = okay
Terrorists attack the US
Modelers building US and coalition equipment in group builds = okay
Russia invades Ukraine
Modelers building Ukrainian equipment in group builds = political slant and 'taking sides'
I just ordered a bunch of Ukrainian Air Force decals and have kits to put them on because yeah, I'm taking their side!
I'm in
-
1 hour ago, ScottsGT said:
Isn't the Marines only getting the B version? Or was it only the Marines will have the B version? As in Marines will fly B&C?
Of course I'll get this one, but really wanting a B myself. Well, I want all 3. Already have the A model. But this is great news for use big scale guys!
We have both the B and C.
Time to start getting this enlarged to 32nd scale! The VMFA-314 option is an F-35C.
- Marcel111, Isar 30/07, Tomcatfreak and 18 others
-
20
-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, Juggernut said:
Do you have special access to their inventory or is this information that anyone can see? I couldn't see it but may not be looking in the right place.
With respect to the information in your post and based on the pedigree and price of the kit, I think most of us guessed it would not be a good seller. Kind of like putting lipstick on a pig.
You have to know the ultra-classified G-14 password and have to be on a need to know basis.....
Nah, like previously mentioned, just add an item to your cart multiple times (or start with a really high number) and it will stop at whatever quantity is on hand. I checked the RF-4 more out of curiosity.
-
When the Phantom Phreaks (Revell) RF-4C arrived at Spruebrothers, there were 850 kits in stock.
As of 5 minutes ago, there are 751 kits in stock.
-
2 hours ago, Jennings Heilig said:
While I have zero interest or intention of building a 1/32 F-14 in my life, I have to say - the only thing that would require a decal to fit a specific kit is one that completely covers an edge-to-edge portion of the airframe. About 99.999% of decals will not do that, and will thus be fine on any kit you put them on. I can’t really think of a single F-14 decal that would require that.
There are actually several markings that won't be fine "on any kit you put them on".
-
If there were new decals for the F-14A in 1/32 scale, would you prefer they be sized to fit the Tamiya or Trumpeter kit (provided you could only choose one)?
-
23 hours ago, ASApilot said:
To return to the original topic. I have both ICM and Roden kits. The biggest advantage the ICM kit has is an accurate Continental engine. ICM also has crisper detail but it does not have the wing tank to fuselage fuel lines. If you want them you will have to scratch them. The Roden kit has the fuel lines and injected bracing wires on the fuselage struts which will help in rigging the wings. Roden also has a firewall which helps if you want to do 450 hp crop duster which I'm doing. I also like Roden's smoother depiction of fabric better than ICM's. I'm a bit of a Stearman fan and built the Silverwings kit as a Navy trainer before either injection molded kit was announced. The Silverwings fuselage shape is off, lacking the more oval cross section.
Thank you
-
6 hours ago, MikeMaben said:
A fan in the area is a good idea (if you don't already have one)
Roden's are generally less expensive than ICM. Sbros have a Roden for $52, did you find one for less than that ? Just curious.
I should have been more clear. I meant when compared to the Silver Wings kit. While the ICM is a bit more expensive than the Roden kit, it appears ICM has the better kit overall.
-
11 minutes ago, esarmstrong said:
The big problem with resin kits, outside of the health considerations: price. Always an issue compared to injection molded kits.
Well, with all of the crap I was exposed to over the course of a 22 year career in the Marine Corps, resin dust or it's adverse health affects are the least of my worries!! Price on the other hand is the deciding factor with regard to this kit subject, as well as the kit itself. ICM it is!
-
29 minutes ago, Sabrejet said:
Not sure about those two, but I'd seriously consider Silver Wings' Stearman PT-13D/N2S-2 (32-015).
Yeah, based on the fact there are no prices listed on their site and the few kits Hannants has on hand are all over $100, their kit isn't going to be an option.
-
Gentlemen,
Do any of you have both kits on hand and able to provide some insight on which kit you prefer and why?
Any and all information is greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Dave
-
Flying Leathernecks Decals FL32009 Leathernecks Legacy Hornets
in Vendors Board
Posted
The AN/APX-111 IFF has absolutely nothing to do with Ordnance configurations.