leoasman Posted March 4, 2017 Posted March 4, 2017 Ben, you'll have to do a complete carrier deck to accomodate all your Navy birds... Question: Were the C-2s assigned to specific carrier air wings?? Cheers Rainer Each squadron (VRC-30 and VRC-40) send detachments with the carrier air wings when the deploy. VRC-30 has a permanent det based with the air wing at Atsugi, but technically still fall under the squadron umbrella at North Island NAS. Each detachment typically consists of two aircraft and around 60 personnel. Rainer Hoffmann 1
Radders Posted March 4, 2017 Posted March 4, 2017 Wish I could design CAD stuff, I would love to get something like this going. I am planning a scratch build, not the Savage (on hold until I get better drawings), something a bit easier..Russian. Can't wait to see this progress!
alaninaustria Posted March 4, 2017 Posted March 4, 2017 Ingenious!! Can't wait to see it all come together!! Cheers Alan
Starfighter Posted March 8, 2017 Author Posted March 8, 2017 (edited) Sorry for replying so late, folks - I am a bit sick since a few days and had loads of other things to do. Great to have you here, I'll do my best not to disappoint you. I have made entirely new drawings in the meantime as I have received Grumman factory drawings which should help me to build a more accurate replica. The parts will be lasercut and should be available within the next few days. I'll assemble the new skeleton right away and show you a comparison with the first version - I hope it'll be worth the extra work and money. Edited March 8, 2017 by Starfighter allthumbs, stusbke and HerculesPA_2 3
Joel_W Posted March 8, 2017 Posted March 8, 2017 Ben I'm looking forward to seeing your improvements in the 2nd set. While I'll never have the skills needed for scratch building or even a major conversion, just following along is experience that is most rewarding. Joel
Lee White Posted March 8, 2017 Posted March 8, 2017 While I'll never have the skills needed for scratch building or even a major conversion, Respectfully disagree with this statement. Your F4F build shows that you are already halfway there. Joel_W 1
Joel_W Posted March 8, 2017 Posted March 8, 2017 Respectfully disagree with this statement. Your F4F build shows that you are already halfway there. Lee, Thanks so much for that ego building compliment, but it's the other half that seems next to impossible to attain. Joel
Starfighter Posted March 9, 2017 Author Posted March 9, 2017 There is absolutely no doubt you can scratchbuild, Joel - just give it a try. You'll see, it's fun! Here is a quick look at the new skeleton by the way: The new parts will be available within next week. Pretty curious to see how they'll turn out! HerculesPA_2, tucohoward, Derek B and 5 others 8
Rainer Hoffmann Posted March 9, 2017 Posted March 9, 2017 There is absolutely no doubt you can scratchbuild, Joel - just give it a try. You'll see, it's fun! Here is a quick look at the new skeleton by the way: The new parts will be available within next week. Pretty curious to see how they'll turn out! Pity, that all those glorious colors will be lost under the skin... ;-) Cheers Rainer Starfighter, stusbke and Lee White 3
Joel_W Posted March 9, 2017 Posted March 9, 2017 Ben, Maybe one day I'll give it a try, especailly if I want to correct the Trumpeter P-51B wings if the HK model never makes it to the hobby shop shelves. Joel Lee White and Starfighter 2
Starfighter Posted March 15, 2017 Author Posted March 15, 2017 Joel, please do so - i'd love to see the result! I have received the new lasercut parts yesterday - here's a crappy pic showing the difference between the new skeleton in front of the old one. The screenshot illustrates some of the shape differences between the new skeleton based on Grumman drawings and the old one based on the Kinetic kit. The length is identical, I just didn't align them properly. All I need is some bench time now! Jeff, Lars Befring, HerculesPA_2 and 5 others 8
Joel_W Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 Ben, What a huge difference. I'm going to assume that the wing spar shape in the Grumman based skeleton is how they actually constructed the aircraft, while the kinetic one is because the wing is a completely separate assembly. Joel Out2gtcha 1
Out2gtcha Posted March 15, 2017 Posted March 15, 2017 Well wont THIS be a little gem! blackbetty and Joel_W 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now