dutik Posted March 30, 2022 Author Share Posted March 30, 2022 Two kidneys and a lung and it's yours Duck and cover - dutik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutik Posted March 31, 2022 Author Share Posted March 31, 2022 BTW, I forgot this one: Regards! - dutik Youngtiger1, Landrotten Highlander, Jack and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 Wow, do i miss these conventions, great pictures, thanks for sharing, very inspirational!!! LSP_K2 and dutik 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutik Posted April 1, 2022 Author Share Posted April 1, 2022 Well, 1:32, flies in the atmosphere, WWII Luftwaffen-livery (note the radar-aerials!), guess this has qualified for an LSP Regards - dutik Greif8, chukw, Landrotten Highlander and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted April 1, 2022 Share Posted April 1, 2022 Some mighty cool models here. Thanks, Dutik. dutik 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeroen_R90S Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Thanks for sharing these -I had intended to go there finally, (never been there before), and make it a weekend trip with my camper van. Unfortunately other issues threw a spanner in the gears so was not able to go. Hopefully next year! LSP_K2 and dutik 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfighter Posted April 13, 2022 Share Posted April 13, 2022 On 3/30/2022 at 4:09 PM, dutik said: Bens stuff is following now... Thanks for sharing your photos - it was a pleasure to meet you! Just to clarify, not all of these models were made by me - you already mentioned the incredible 1/48th scale Enterprise parts built by Thomas Matzer. The AU-1 was built by Stephan Ortmann, The F-4J and the F-14A were built by Frank Löchte, the F-5F and the A-4E were built by Daniel Dietrich and the F-4S and the A-6E were built by our very own @Marcel111! On 3/30/2022 at 4:43 PM, easixpedro said: Wow, I didn't realize Ben is building that much more! Very cool, thanks for sharing! ... and I didn't even bring half of the stuff I've started! On 3/30/2022 at 4:54 PM, Out2gtcha said: DUDE, you started printing a 32nd Osprey?!?? NEED!!! That's actually already the Mk2 version... Marcel111 and dutik 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alaninaustria Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 MV-22 in 1/32…. Holy grail! Just say’n!! Cheers Alan dutik 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel111 Posted December 31, 2022 Share Posted December 31, 2022 On 3/30/2022 at 5:53 AM, dutik said: The Ukrainians have a splendid digital camo for aircraft. This should suit the Mig much better... Your encouragement and general air of positivity is noted. And you know what they say about opinions, which no doubt includes opinions on camo scheme choices. Looking forward to taking a close look at your models at the next EME. Cheers, Marcel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutik Posted January 2, 2023 Author Share Posted January 2, 2023 (edited) @Marcel111 You are welcome. IP' 1984 is our booth, as always. - dutik Edited January 2, 2023 by dutik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck540z3 Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 On 3/30/2022 at 3:53 AM, dutik said: This one was the winner of my personal "Ugliest camouflage" trophy: The Ukrainians have a splendid digital camo for aircraft. This should suit the Mig much better... Regards - dutik This comment and critique are so wrong on so many levels. I don't recall seeing your work displayed in these forums to gauge your own skill level, but even if it is very high, to trash another modeler's work in this forum like this shows no manners or class. Unbelievable. Chuck Marcel111 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutik Posted January 10, 2023 Author Share Posted January 10, 2023 I was never talking about the work of the modeler. It is the look of the aircrafts original camouflage that is ugly. The Ukrainians have a lot of splendid digital camo patterns. This kind of color+pattern choice by the Ukrainians is just looking ugly. That's the message. With the paintjob of the modeler is nothing wrong. Whatever you read here, please keep in mind: A good share of forum members are not native English speakers. If I would have written my posts here in my native language everything would have been clear beyound any doubt - but also not understandable to a large share of the readers which are not talking this language. The forum language is English, so the comments are written in English. Hit and miss included. Just give the benefit of the doubt if someones comments look a bit off the track. If you are a especially kind guy you might also ask the author of the post what he wanted to say. A bit of help might be welcome to the non-native members. Thank you. Hope this clarifies the issues. Regards - dutik LSP_K2, Jan_G, panzerrob and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY IVAN5 Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, dutik said: I was never talking about the work of the modeler. It is the look of the aircrafts original camouflage that is ugly. The Ukrainians have a lot of splendid digital camo patterns. This kind of color+pattern choice by the Ukrainians is just looking ugly. That's the message. With the paintjob of the modeler is nothing wrong. Whatever you read here, please keep in mind: A good share of forum members are not native English speakers. If I would have written my posts here in my native language everything would have been clear beyound any doubt - but also not understandable to a large share of the readers which are not talking this language. The forum language is English, so the comments are written in English. Hit and miss included. Just give the benefit of the doubt if someones comments look a bit off the track. If you are a especially kind guy you might also ask the author of the post what he wanted to say. A bit of help might be welcome to the non-native members. Thank you. Hope this clarifies the issues. Regards - dutik Well, it was clear to me that you weren't "bagging" on the builder . I'am glad that you responded and I get the language thing too, I'm a native English speaker and even I have a rough time conveying my thoughts correctly[ it's what old age does to ya] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck540z3 Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 1 hour ago, dutik said: I was never talking about the work of the modeler. It is the look of the aircrafts original camouflage that is ugly. The Ukrainians have a lot of splendid digital camo patterns. This kind of color+pattern choice by the Ukrainians is just looking ugly. That's the message. With the paintjob of the modeler is nothing wrong. Whatever you read here, please keep in mind: A good share of forum members are not native English speakers. If I would have written my posts here in my native language everything would have been clear beyound any doubt - but also not understandable to a large share of the readers which are not talking this language. The forum language is English, so the comments are written in English. Hit and miss included. Just give the benefit of the doubt if someones comments look a bit off the track. If you are a especially kind guy you might also ask the author of the post what he wanted to say. A bit of help might be welcome to the non-native members. Thank you. Hope this clarifies the issues. Regards - dutik It does now, so all good. I happen to know the guy who built and painted that Mig and he was understandably upset by your comments, as was I when reading them. As they say, “something was lost in translation”, so if that’s what happened, my apologies back to you. Cheers, Chuck JayW and dutik 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel111 Posted January 11, 2023 Share Posted January 11, 2023 (edited) Dutik, thanks for explaining yourself, although the intent has always been clear to me. The message of your post is equivalent to you spending months considering the selection of a new car, you then purchasing it and driving it to work and a person at work telling you it’s the ugliest car on the parking lot. It’s an insult of your choice and not an insult of your car design skills. Or another example would be you leaving a comment on Chuck‘s current F-16 thread stating that it’s the ugliest scheme on an F-16 you‘ve ever seen. You‘d be insulting his choice of camo scheme and I‘m pretty sure that wouldn’t be well received by Chuck. I‘m not entirely convinced of the sincerity of your walk-back since it only happened after Chuck, who obviously has a huge following around here, responded to your post. You also continue to refer to the scheme as ugly (I obviously disagree else I wouldn’t have selected the scheme). Cheers, Marcel Edited January 11, 2023 by Marcel111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now