Landrotten Highlander

Thanks for the clarification. Just got myself Rhino but have not gotten round to workin on it.

One thing to keep in mind is that there are 2 methodologies in CAD: One is feature based (e.g. defining curves, fillets , holes etc). This is the type most often used in industrial desing (can be anythin really, from shoes to high performance combat aircraft). The other is surface based (think working with polygons - squares & triangles) with which you make up the shapes and volumes you are after. Both have their focues, and therefore their merit. The first option has many positives, but the most important one I was shown in my (recent) education is that you need to plan much more in advance, and when things do not work it can be really frustrating trying to find out why. However, this apporach allows for the simulation and analysis of things like interference, thickness, stress etc. Think of it like workin in wood or metal: you chip away at what you do not want (e.g. where you want a hole) and you add another block if you need it to be biger, then chip away at that to et the shape you want. The second option is more intuitive in that you can move vertices (those points where the lines meet) to create a hump or a dimple where you want it. For example, I started with a simple cube, and over 16 hours changed the look of the cube into a 3D representation of the head of one of my lecturers. (He saw the work, and enjoyed it very much). This type of CAD model is actually an empty shell - no thicknesses in the walls of the object. However, these things are then textured and rendered and can look really realistic on screen. This is the process used in special effects (VFX). Look at this like working with virtual clay - you stretch, push & twist to eet the shape you want. So if you want to compare CAD packaes, best not to compare a feature based software like fusion 360 with a surface-based software like Rhino or Blender, as those are totally different beasts.

most likely, but I did ask them a couple of times for a kit that was not listed on their website and they got it for me - even if it took some patience

I did notice they have the Ta152 in stick, but it is 1:48

I bought most of my ZM kits via this webshop: https://www.flying-tigers.co.uk/ May be worth contacting them to see if they are willing to et one in for you? It has been a lon time since I ordered anything from Japan, so cannot comment on current shipping and custom costs...

I can wee the pocture I can see the picture (in Scotland)

Postman just dropped off my order from Jadlam which included this book. Had a quick look throuh the paes. First section contains the history of this war as indicated. Second seccions contains detailed photographs and description of techniques used of 6 models of airplanes used in this conflict, nicely balanced by 3 of each side. Wonderful addition to the library, and a massive thank you to Boch for his outstanding work.

Christmas has come early with this news... just a PITA that I will have t owait until next year (hopfully) to have the actual thing in me possession.

Ordered with Jadlam (site said it was in stock)

I have recently dealt with Meindert, and ave received my order in good time (given the fact he does all orders on piece-meal basis). They arrived last week and look really good. Will be continuing the build with these decals some time over the next few weeks. I would say: buy with confidence...

For me in the UK, a large, purple square with some unwelcome words in white on it....

As Spock would say: logic demands you choose another squadron.

wat brand is this? tried to find using my usual search engine but it ave me all sorts of metal paints...

wishing you and your family strength in this difficult time

I don't know about you guys, but I rather he focusses on the quality of the kits at the expense of some minor inconvenience for purchasing.