seiran01 Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Pup7309, Out2gtcha, scvrobeson and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esarmstrong Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 26 minutes ago, Tnarg said: That camo on the 0/100 almost looks Italian. Wild and Crazy. Tnarg looks like a combination of PC 8 and PC 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monthebiff Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 So are we expecting a release of the 400 and 100 at the same time as they are planning with the Lancaster or is the 100 coming later? Regards. Andy Out2gtcha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Radu just posted it........ The new WnW kit is a....... DR.1 Triplane!!! Bill_S and spacewolf 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seiran01 Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Where did he post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagemusha Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seiran01 Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Out2gtcha, timvkampen, ghatherly and 4 others 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Wow, two versions too! I wonder what the differences are between the early and late DRs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringleheim Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 The 0400 really looks interesting and the folded wing design makes displaying this beast more realistic. By the way, I'm looking at those Lancaster photos and thinking "Gosh, I never saw it before, but that plane looks like a diesel electric locomotive with wings on it!" Maybe I'm just nuts. Rick Griewski and Vandy 1 VX 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seiran01 Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 28 minutes ago, Out2gtcha said: Wow, two versions too! I wonder what the differences are between the early and late DRs. Early includes the F.1 according to the flyer. The main visual difference I know of is that the F1 had a differently shaped tailplane. I believe there are some subtle differences in the cowling as well that may have carried over to early Dr1s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringleheim Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 7 minutes ago, seiran01 said: Early includes the F.1 according to the flyer. The main visual difference I know of is that the F1 had a differently shaped tailplane. I believe there are some subtle differences in the cowling as well that may have carried over to early Dr1s This is taken from my notes on the Fokker DR. I. Information comes from Dan-San Abbott Gentlemen: There are several differences between the Fok F.I, first production order and the revised design Fok.DR.I. Fok.F.I/DR.I Fok.DR.I Top span 7190mm 7200mm middle span 6225 6230 lower span 5725 5770 wing chord 980 1000 Aileron balance 625 200 Aileron trailing edge taper 2 spaces 1 space The Fok.F.I had a different cowl and no wing skids and a curved leading edge on the tailplane. Fok.DR.I from 104/17 had the revised cowling and had wing skids and a straight leading edge on trhe tailplane. The original wing and the revised wing had the same Gottigen airfoil The aircraft total weight differed, F.I=571kg. Dr.I 586kg. Blue skies, Dan-San Kagemusha, ghatherly, D Bellis and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monthebiff Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 Bet the wing span on both early and late kits are the same though, I mean why would they do that. Regards. Andy Out2gtcha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 I dont know man, Sir Peters crew usually seem to be very anal about things like that, and I wouldn't put it past them to put all the differences in the two versions, including the different spans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringleheim Posted August 7, 2019 Share Posted August 7, 2019 The differences are visually very minimal. You have the curved vs. straight leading edge of the tail plane difference and wings skids vs. no wing skids. More than that isn't going to be very obvious. Probably wouldn't know the difference in cowl shape unless both were side by side and then differences would be minimal. You probably aren't going to notice that .3mm difference in top wing span length in 1/32 scale! monthebiff and Out2gtcha 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_Kevin Posted August 7, 2019 Author Share Posted August 7, 2019 I wasn't even aware of the O/100 before today. How does it differ from the more familiar O/400? Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now