esarmstrong

The ebay speculators that have been listing this kit at prices north of $300.00 have got to be pi$$ed.

http://www.wingnutwings.com/ww/product?productid=3197 Return of the prodigal son: Harry Tate.

I am no expert; however the differences I can see are: Early Nieuport Late Nieuport Clear transparent center area of upper wing Center area of upper wing not clear and reinforced Lower sesquiplane has less reinforced leading More reinforced front edge of sesquiplane. This is visible on the model. edges. Area behind firewall simply opens up along a Area behind firewall has circular access panel, making for less along a panel line revealing entire area behind exposed area behind the firewall. firewall

The thing I like best about the film is that it's pre-cut. I always have disliked dealing with film mainly because you have to cut it along lines printed on the film. Looks like CSM have just gone one step further and dye-cut the line rather than print it. Why has no one done this before?!

Thought I would give this thread a bump. I was under the impression that ICM was going to be announcing their upcoming releases in 1/32 scale for 2019. Any word on this?

^^ I don't know if WNW will do a Caudron G.4, but Copperstate has already done one in 1/48 scale. Would they dare to upscale to 1/32...

I makes sense that they would do more Polikarpovs that are related to the I-153 and I-16. They could easily do the I-16 type 10 and 17 based on what has been released thus far. Take a look at the stock numbers that have been assigned to their 1/32 scale range. There are a lot of unused numbers between the used ones.

I love the stubby little Rata; and the Seagull (I-153) is fine, too. I'm just glad we are finally beginning to see GPW Soviet subjects in 1/32 scale.

Maybe they will upscale the Lagg-3 from 1/48 they did a few years ago. I do like the GPW stuff.

http://www.icm.com.ua/news/559-i-16-type-29-wwii-soviet-fighter.html The Polikarpov I-16 type 29 is out now, too.

Agreeable price. If the Hs. 129 is offered at a comparable price then we will definitely be in business...

You do not have to respond like an arrogant jack___ every time about something as trivial as the color of an airplane over 70 years ago. These issues are more fun to discuss for many of us than important. Your abrasive and arrogant tone reflects poorly on you and it flares up regularly on here. It has a lasting affect in ways that are not immediately apparent in the heat of the moment.

Whatever...

Purely my best guess based on the article and pictures, but it looks like "Lou IV" was camouflaged with a "mixed blue" of some sort, but what about the possibility of extra dark sea grey paired with British dark green?

No. Where would this research be found?