Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Depends - do you want a short-tailed K with fin fillet, or the long-tailed version?

Posted (edited)

And dive duly done.  As far as I can see the main difference between the E and the K was the engine.  As an aside, the longer tail came in with the P-40K-10-CU, before that was the short tail with a fillet.

 

The E's engine was a V-1710-39, the K was powered by a V-1710-73; I am not an engine expert so I have no idea what the differences were, sorry.  Both could carry a centre-line tank or bomb, both carried 6 x 0.5" guns.  Externally, I think the only noticeable difference was the early K's fin fillet.

 

This comes from a spreadsheet I put together of P-40 variants way back in my 1:48 days: my main sources for that were www.p40warhawk.com and the IPMS Stockholm site.  My spreadsheet and therefore this info may well be incomplete, so anyone more knowledgeable than I reading this, please do chip in.  Nevertheless, hope this is helpful.

Edited by MikeC
Posted
35 minutes ago, MikeC said:

And dive duly done.  As far as I can see the main difference between the E and the K was the engine.  As an aside, the longer tail came in with the P-40K-10-CU, before that was the short tail with a fillet.

 

The E's engine was a V-1710-39, the K was powered by a V-1710-73; I am not an engine expert so I have no idea what the differences were, sorry.  Both could carry a centre-line tank or bomb, both carried 6 x 0.5" guns.  Externally, I think the only noticeable difference was the early K's fin fillet.

 

This comes from a spreadsheet I put together of P-40 variants way back in my 1:48 days: my main sources for that were www.p40warhawk.com and the IPMS Stockholm site.  My spreadsheet and therefore this info may well be incomplete, so anyone more knowledgeable than I reading this, please do chip in.  Nevertheless, hope this is helpful.

Thanking you, Mike

Posted
2 hours ago, MikeC said:

As far as I can see the main difference between the E and the K was the engine.

The engine was different, but not visibly so.

 

The early "short tail" K had a much wider fin, not just a 'fillet'. This is the early K fin:

aQLiAoM.jpg

 

Compare that to the E fin (which was structurally the same as that used on the later "long tail" versions):

lnhoIBF.jpg

 

Hasegawa provided different parts for the aft fuselage/fin to cover the E, K and also the later "long tail" versions. 

 

HTH,

D

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 9/18/2023 at 8:45 PM, thierry laurent said:

Unfortunately the short tail with a fillet was noticeably different and out of my memory such tail parts were only in the P-40K release.

IIRC, there was another boxing that offered the 2 tails, but I may be wrong... :rolleyes:

Too bad that Eduard didn't re-issued that one...

Edited by GeeBee
Posted
2 hours ago, GeeBee said:

IIRC, there was another boxing that offered the 2 tails, but I may be wrong... :rolleyes:

Too bad that Eduard didn't re-issued that one...

I don't think so. There was only one K boxing and it was released right after the E.

Posted
39 minutes ago, thierry laurent said:

I don't think so. There was only one K boxing and it was released right after the E.

 

There was a Flying Tigers boxing that was marketed as an E/K, and it comes with both tails in the box.

 

I sure hope that Hobby 2000 takes a stab at these kits, as they've started delving into the 1/32 Hasegawa line.

 

- Dennis S.

   Mount Juliet, TN USA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...