Jump to content

Preview: HK Models 1/32 B-17E/F


LSP_Kevin

Recommended Posts

The nose piece looks good to my eye; certainly not a B-17G nose pretending to be something it isn't.

 

I guess i'll be the contrarian here and say i'm planning on an "E" version myself. Thought about doing one factory fresh, or one of the Hawaiian Air Depot marked planes at Midway, or possibly Suzy-Q.

 

Is it just me or does that head on view of the nose glass remind me of a sea otter with his mouth open?

 

-d-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Vulcan32

The more pics I see, the more I´m sure to buy this kit.

I hope this will be the box-art (source: scalemates)

 

990811-12910-74.jpg

Edited by LSP_Kevin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the pre-view of the HK (test shot) kit :)

 

This kit will cry for details, so I recommend the IPMS NL walkaround at:

 

http://www.ipms.nl/walkarounds/walkaround-vliegtuigen-props/540-walkaround-b17-fortress.html

 

Though often "preserved museum" B-17G's , and maybe not fully original, a lot of the details will be similar to machines used in the Second World war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That shape is much, much closer to the prototype....  I like it.  It needs the little access door on the R/H side of the optically flat bombardier's panel and while we're at it, that bombardier's glass panel seems just a bit wide to my eye but again, it might just be my eye.  Overall, a huge improvement on the previous effort. 

 

12316519_1709853832584419_62066135784921

12513646_977228138999603_279097347026776

 

Images lifted from KarlH's previous post (1st image) and Lee White's post #69 in B-17 Reference Material over in GD.

 

Karl,

 

Is that optically flat bombardier's glass panel made from armored glass or what material?  I know it's not perspex (English word for plexiglass?)

Edited by Juggernut
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bombardiers panel was glass and IIRC it was multi-layered. Yes, it needs that opening panel and the glass does look a bit odd shaped but that could be the angle we are looking at it. Not perfect, but certainly better. If they offered just to sell the fuselage, I might consider it. That could sit on a shelf. I really do not have room for the whole thing.

Edited by Karl H
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Smitty44

 

Here are the new CAD images of which Graham speaks:

 

12967367_1674807742768844_20927832835953

 

12901532_1674807726102179_27416708436250

 

12961213_1674807729435512_32020051269557

 

Kev

Sweetness! I will be needing one by June 12th please!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...