akeller Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 Derek, Great question. It seems to me that vac formed parts are perfectly viable in the context you described. I've been looking at 1/32nd scale conversions for the F4U (-5, -7, AU-1)and found 1 rather obscure source of quality resin parts with costs over $100 delivered to North America. So much resin used that doesn't provide a lot of extra value. I need an accurate part at a reasonable price - period. I can add detail to suit my needs and skill sets. Keep up the good work. Al Keller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Noras Posted March 2, 2012 Share Posted March 2, 2012 (edited) Hi Derek I would't mind vacform if it is Echelon quality or even better ( if possible). But I hope for resin parts to go for the finer details. A suggestion for a conversion ( I don't know if it's been mentioned already) , but how about a Me-163S conversion? And I really hope to be able to build a British Phantom or two in the near future Keep up the good work. (-: Roy Edited March 3, 2012 by Roy Noras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_Kevin Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 A suggestion for a conversion ( I don't know if it's been mentioned already) , but how about a Me-163S conversion? I think Derek did already mention this one as a possibility. Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phasephantomphixer Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Although not in 1/32, Koster Ent. does such mixed media conversions. Their F-101 single seat Recce has you replacing the forward fuselage with Vac. and the rest in resin bits ('cept the clear vac. canopy of course). Speaking of Clear Vac. Would be cool if someone did a line continuing from what Falcon has made of 1/32 replacement canopies. Mostly to get rid of the incorrectly shaped, squashed, thick, or otherwise bad kit ones. Edited March 3, 2012 by phasephantomphixer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Peterpools Posted March 3, 2012 Share Posted March 3, 2012 Derek Great idea. Since coming back to the hobby, I've spent a disproportionate amount of money on resin AM products. For the most part the detail was fantastic but the fit, well that's another topic. Rivets, I'm with you. Totally unrealistic. Tough to see panel line on an aircraft 32 feet away, let alone rivets unless is covered in dirt and rust (not my cup of tea). If the vac parts are accurate, crisp details, fine panel lines and fit well - GO FOR IT! Sounds great and depending on the subject; I'm in! Peter :speak_cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Derek, Great question. It seems to me that vac formed parts are perfectly viable in the context you described. I've been looking at 1/32nd scale conversions for the F4U (-5, -7, AU-1)and found 1 rather obscure source of quality resin parts with costs over $100 delivered to North America. So much resin used that doesn't provide a lot of extra value. I need an accurate part at a reasonable price - period. I can add detail to suit my needs and skill sets. Keep up the good work. Al Keller Thank you Al - that is pretty much my thought as well (the -7 and AU-1 Corsairs are also something that I would like to tackle one day!). Derek Edited March 3, 2012 by Derek B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) Although not in 1/32, Koster Ent. does such mixed media conversions. Their F-101 single seat Recce has you replacing the forward fuselage with Vac. and the rest in resin bits ('cept the clear vac. canopy of course). Speaking of Clear Vac. Would be cool if someone did a line continuing from what Falcon has made of 1/32 replacement canopies. Mostly to get rid of the incorrectly shaped, squashed, thick, or otherwise bad kit ones. My conversion kits would also follow this principle. Good idea about the canopies...we'll see what happens once I get established with the vac parts? Derek Edited March 3, 2012 by Derek B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 Derek Great idea. Since coming back to the hobby, I've spent a disproportionate amount of money on resin AM products. For the most part the detail was fantastic but the fit, well that's another topic. Rivets, I'm with you. Totally unrealistic. Tough to see panel line on an aircraft 32 feet away, let alone rivets unless is covered in dirt and rust (not my cup of tea). If the vac parts are accurate, crisp details, fine panel lines and fit well - GO FOR IT! Sounds great and depending on the subject; I'm in! Peter :speak_cool: Thank you for your support Peter Derek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 (edited) I think Derek did already mention this one as a possibility. Kev Me 163S: Kev is quite right Roy - I mentioned it in post #18 of this thread - it is one I have had planned for a long time Derek Edited March 3, 2012 by Derek B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 3, 2012 Author Share Posted March 3, 2012 Andy, Hey, I want one of those! What's the story with that? Would love to have a conversion for the 262 U3. See post #64 Mike Derek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jozef Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 I think it is a good way to go. All points of attention I would mention were already mentioned here. I really think it is a great way how to render a less expensive option of some very much needed and asked for conversions (yes, I am talking about the Brit Phantom). And without mentioning the specific person I know of at least one aftermarket guy who considers the same route. Keep my fingers crossed that you do a right decision. Jozef Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssculptor Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Ah - cool... Stephen mentioned it in his post - Trumpeter/Hobbyboss - I was going to convert a 21st Century kit a while back - but stopped plans when Trumpeter announced. IIRC the 'B' is on it's way - not sure latest on the 'A' - but I'd love one as Spanish Civil Way type - and I like that period Iain Iain, are you sure that the Ju-87 to be issued by Trumpeter is the B? Well if it is true then once again the manufacturers illustrate their total lack of imagination. We have three Ju-87B kits already, the old Revell/USA, the 21st Century and the Hasegawa. So sure. lets issue another one. These people disgust me. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloorwestSiR Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Hi Derek, I like the idea of using vac formed parts for the larger parts of the conversion. Although I've never done a vac formed kit, it would be an opportunity to learn new techniques. That and if I muck up, replacement parts shouldn't be too expensive to get. I definitely do like the idea of using female molds though. If you take a look at many of the Tamiya RC car bodies, they are done with female molds and the level of detail is impressive. Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagemusha Posted March 4, 2012 Share Posted March 4, 2012 Iain, are you sure that the Ju-87 to be issued by Trumpeter is the B? Well if it is true then once again the manufacturers illustrate their total lack of imagination. We have three Ju-87B kits already, the old Revell/USA, the 21st Century and the Hasegawa. So sure. lets issue another one. These people disgust me. Stephen Bit strong there Stephen, they're no doubt just trying to turn a profit, and there have been just two B's, the very old Revell and the 21st Century kits, the Trumpeter is a B http://www.1999.co.jp/eng/10176873 and if they didn't release popular kits there's no way they'd be releasing the Anton, food for thought..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 4, 2012 Author Share Posted March 4, 2012 Hi Derek, I like the idea of using vac formed parts for the larger parts of the conversion. Although I've never done a vac formed kit, it would be an opportunity to learn new techniques. That and if I muck up, replacement parts shouldn't be too expensive to get. I definitely do like the idea of using female molds though. If you take a look at many of the Tamiya RC car bodies, they are done with female molds and the level of detail is impressive. Carl Thanks Carl Having seen a little of your work, I have no doubts that you would be able to use the vacform parts without any problems at all. Cheers Derek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now