Jump to content

Eduard-Cat Me-109D


Recommended Posts

After looking thru the resin bits, it looks pretty straightforward. The prop looks bad; I may have to "do a bit more" to get a decent appearance.

Kev, I still think the old Hase kit is a good kit. The original box art from John Steele sure is good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sat down this AM, and got to work. I marked out the lines to cut with a felt tip marker, and used a ruler and scribe to begin. This one pic shows the tools used, and an overview of todays work. In this view you can just see where the fuselage stiffener has been removed. I first scribed a line along the top of the stiffener, then used a chisel point x-acto to cut away the raised detail. I sharpen my blades with a hard Arkansas stone, and get a nice hone on the edge before cutting. The "beveled" edge goes down, so the blade always wants to rise up, which reduces errors. To finish, I sanded with an 800grit stick.

018.jpg

Here is a really bad closer look at the wing inserts. I am using the E-1 kit, but an E-3 can be used as well. Really just a bit of cutting and fitting to get a fantastic fit. I used my trusty Tristar tool to scribe a couple of underwing ports, and move the gas filler from stbd to port.

019.jpg

Here is a closer shot of the nose, which is 3 pieces. Again, cut and fit with a little help from Ritgers book, which conveniently has some great line drawings in the back to clarify things. The wing gets cut to accept the nose bit, and the key point is the wing root. I've fit them as best I can now, and the rest will come after building the cockpit and closing the fuse. The resin nose is mostly hollow, which cuts down the weight a great deal. I may source some brass legs for this one, but we'll see. I like to pin my birds to the base.

020.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem I found was fitting the nose first made for a rotten wing root fit and even more loss of dihedral. Built OOB the Eduard kit has flat wings, which someone tells you about it, makes it ever the more noticeable....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

I think I may give you some useful tips as there are a lot of conflicting information in references. Even scale plans coming from the same guy but published in different books showed major differences!

Note that the conversion is not comprehensive and fully accurate to build a Bertha. However, situation is far better for a Dora and the Alleycat instructions are generally correct and comprehensive.

1. You may use an E-1 cockpit as differences with the D are not really obvious. The pits were probably painted in RLM02 but I've still some doubts with regard to the front IP (RLM 02 or possibly RLM 66). Using a cheap Quickboost seat is recommended as correcting Eduard seat is time-consuming. The Aires full pit is another option.
2. Some sources show that the belly scoop (located between the two drop-shaped wing bolt covers) was removed. This is not correct! One picture in the Fernandez-Sommerau book clearly shows it was present on the D1. Unfortunately Eduard does not give it as a separate part. Grinding the font face to get some depth is at least recommended.
3. Some sources show that the intake under the front nose was not present. It is true that this appeared during the production of the Jumoschmitts and I cannot say when. However, again, this hole is correct for a D (but not for a Bertha).
4. All drawings differ with regards to the presence or absence and location of some of the maintenance round panels under the wing. It is very difficult to say who's right and who's wrong! One thing is sure (confirmed by a picture), the round panel right behind the landing gear well must be added. For the other ones, this is debatable and personally, I did not add them. According to most sources, two round panels on each of the upper wing shall be filled in.
5. Putting the Eduard photoetched landing gear well covers in the kit is a true nightmare. However, leaving the wells as they are is also a problem. Improving them oneself is also very complicated. So, this is like choosing between plea and cholera!
6. Look closely at the plane you choose. Most Spanish war 109s had no radio mast! Unfortunately, Alleycat "forgot" this aspect! Sanding the mast support and the brace running on the rear canopy is the most accurate option. I did it some years ago, so this is possible. However, ruining the part is a noticeable risk, so this is up to you. Note that this also corrects an error as this upper brace on the full scale plane was located under the glass rather than over it!
7. Eduard tail wheel seems to be based on a museum example which has a Dunlop rather than a Continental tire. If you're a little bit patient, there is no need to use an aftermarket one (such as the one in the Brassin set). Simply sand the edge to remove the squared look with the indentations and you'll get a far more accurate result.
8. Do not forget drilling/opening the ammo chute holes under the wing and the round hole on each side of the rear fuselage (intended to put a bar to lift the plane).

This is what goes out of my memory. I hope this helps

Thierry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...