Andreas Beck

Turning the mud, finding orientation in drizzle and fog: the Messerschmitt-Regensburg built G-10s (not so many) and the G-6 AS and G-14 AS (rather frequent) have a lot in common with the K (concerning profiles) but would need nearly completely new electrodes and molds due to different surface features. Now we have two renowned manufacturers sharing one renowned designer. Who has hands on these DB 605 AS models ? Will there be a solution ? Or is it a simple as that ? A K is a K and a G is a G.

a bit out of the row: Bell 212 in 48th

Trumpy`s F-35C by Kai

Kai Reckstatt made this Gina (while 48ers are still waiting....)

A bit more 32nd stuff: Hunters by Peter Lauerbach from Munich

from 7:40 very short, after that P.1011

Cross kitting with ZM would become a bit costy.....

From what can be seen here is rather obvious. Something must have gone wrong with data transfer from the design unit to the electrode. The marked panel is wrongly embossed on the lower l. wing (also the next but one outwards) and the rivet-presentations are embossed, too. I think this has the consequence to make a new electrode and this mistake will be eliminated with TS 2.

Bf 109 K TS 1 - sprue photos over on BM

3D print material that can be used with PS-glue, that is stabile und does not brittle after some more than usual sunlight and can be worked on with usual tools without any fear.....

Messerschmitt Foundation (at least) Bf s always (!) run rich in order to prevent any damage on the engines. Replacement and/or repair are awfully expensive.

Yepp, 1/35

No, not an odd choice, give them a Big Bravo - because it is a training round into a new genre, and give them a second and a third "odd choice" before doing an Allison Pony, a Griffon Spit, a two stage Merlin Mossie, a Bf 110 G-4 or Dinah, 410, or, or, or.....

ordered and paid on Sep 7th. Paypal account confirms transfer. No confirmation from D. though twice requested (ordinary email and paypal communication channel). Must say I haven´t lost hope. Cheers be