Jump to content

Spitfire XIs... Armour plate behind the seat on the recon birds?


Recommended Posts

Does anyone here know if the spitfire 11s and other specialized recon variants retained the armour plates behind the seat and headrest? I can see design logic for both keeping and eliminating them, and since they'd be so visible with an open canopy I'd like to toss the question to the experten.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PR birds are not really my thing but Spitfires are, so here goes. All of the photos of wartime PR XI aircraft that I looked at are not really helpful but I am pretty sure that at least back armour was fitted. Morgan & Shacklady is not all that forthcoming except to say that some armour was deleted but then they fail to say which armour. There is a PR XI at the USAF museum, and from the photos I have looked at, it has back armour. Remember that the XI is unpressurised and has a 'standard' sliding hood. The X was pressurised and was fitted with the Lobelle hood which has a wider frame around the perspex. I mention this because I have viewed a few builds online and there seems to be some confusion. Anyway I hope that helps.

TRF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spitfire PR.XI preserved at the Defence Forces Aircraft Collection at Gardermoen, Norway has the head armour and armour behind the seat.  The aircraft (one of three) was purchased in 1947, stored for a couple of years, and served until 1954 when it was bought by the pilot who flew the last sortie.  Apart from receiving some inaccurate and inappropriate paintjobs, nothing has been done to the aircraft.

 

Norwegian text only, but the pictures are international:)

 

https://flyblader.com/onewebmedia/Nr 2 Spitfire XI.pdf

 

Edited by jenshb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, thierry laurent said:

All PR XI I have seen kept the armor plate. What is different is the presence or absence of the head cushion. This is really variable.

The head rest is interesting because as you say some Spitfires had one and others didn't. They were removed early on because there were cases of pilots having trouble abandoning ship because the harness was caught on the head rest. I don't know whether the removal was official or down to individual pilots as there are lots of photos with and without.

TRF

A little further info. According to Edgar Brookes headrests were to be deleted from all types from 29-10-42 except Seafires. This was into Mk V production hence some with and some without. According to Edgar PR pilots were a law unto themselves and could do whatever they wanted regarding headrests. And to clarify my earlier post, by back armour I really meant head and back armour.

Edited by fastterry
additional info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2020 at 3:44 AM, Rockie Yarwood said:

Holy Crap, Batman! One copy available from Amazon USA for the low, low, price of $902.81 USD! Makes me want to cry.

 

Rockie

Could make me very happy, were it not for the fact that my copies of this and its companion volume are not for sale at any price.  Having said that, the price for the single copy on Amazon UK is a bit more reasonable.   https://www.amazon.co.uk/Merlin-Spitfires-Detail-Classic-Warbirds/dp/0958229651

 

I had a quick flick through, and there is no mention of seat armour being absent or present.  There is one drawing of the seat, which shows the armour in place, but whether that drawing is specifically of a PRXI seat or a generic Spitfire seat is not specified.

 

Edited by MikeC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...