Jump to content

Too shiny to be NMF?


Gazzas

Recommended Posts

Good picture, yup that panel must have come from another aircraft I guess, that's the kind of detail us modellers would never think of doing.

Also it just goes to show the different shades or types of aluminium or whatever skin cover it is, some seem more shiny than others ... going from mirror like to dull shades, bet no two aircraft were the same?

 

Edited by Southern Bandit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Southern Bandit said:


And I wonder what the 4309 on the two adjacent panels signify's? There is a reason for every thing ... bet the Tamiya kit does not have that stencil. heh

 

I could well be wrong, but I see the panels as reading 4309 and 4303, respectively.  But I have not seen a larger picture, so my guess is based only on the one you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mark_C said:

 

I could well be wrong, but I see the panels as reading 4309 and 4303, respectively.  But I have not seen a larger picture, so my guess is based only on the one you posted.

 

I think you are right Mark, my eyesight is not so good these days, fortunately I have an eyesight test booked for early next month as my two yearly test and I'll now need glasses for general use rather than just reading books use ETC I needed last time ... and that was with me on a 4K monitor too ... I still wonder what the numbers mean though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MikeMaben said:

 

 

qXMgdIp.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

To me, this model shows some of the key effects needed for a believable NMF finish.  That's the slight pucker around the rivets and other textural and irregular contours caused to the metal itself as the plane ages.

 

But, trying to keep these in scale would most likely be the most difficult part.

 

I've seen a few tin-canning tutorials and though helpful, I'm not sure that I've yet to see it done in a completely believable manner.  Might be one of those "too difficult" things to accomplish in scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Southern Bandit said:

Good picture, yup that panel must have come from another aircraft I guess, that's the kind of detail us modellers would never think of doing....

 

If you did, no-one would believe you without a picture placed next to the model.

 

Interesting discussion.  My overwhelming memory of seeing NMF aircraft, at airshows in the 1960s and 70s, was how dull they were, a sort of whitish shade of metal.  Humbrol 11 silver, which was all we had in those days, just didn't look right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MikeC said:

If you did, no-one would believe you without a picture placed next to the model.

 

Interesting discussion.  My overwhelming memory of seeing NMF aircraft, at airshows in the 1960s and 70s, was how dull they were, a sort of whitish shade of metal.  Humbrol 11 silver, which was all we had in those days, just didn't look right.

The pics above aside, the vast majority of NMF aircraft where not that shiny.   Check out an aluminum canoe that’s been stored outdoors for a year or two. The finish is closer to a silverish matt light grey.  Very hard to accurately replicate.   I think I’ve seen only 3-4 models that (IMO) got it right.   

 

In the top pic, wouldn’t be surprised if he was washing down that aircraft with avgas.    Today, the unit EH&S officer would have the poor guy up on charges!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Gazzas said:

I remember reading that the blue-nosed unit had theirs polished, too.  Can't remember who they were but they were in Europe.  Perhaps it was more prevalent than is thought?

 

 

352nd FG, part of the Mighty Eighth.  http://www.littlefriends.co.uk/groups/352nd-fighter-group/

 

Plenty of photos in the gallery http://www.littlefriends.co.uk/galleries/352nd-fighter-squadron/

Hard to tell sometimes, but I don't think these look particularly polished.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MikeC said:

 

Hard to tell sometimes, but I don't think these look particularly polished.

 

Mike,

    Thanks for the links.  I imagine the photographers would have done as much as possible to take photos from angles to eliminate glare as much as possible.

 

Otherwise you get photos like this:

pz-t.jpg

 

Make me wonder how many "poor" photos got thrown away.

 

Gaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...