Jump to content

scjh

LSP_Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    6

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1.    LSP_K2 reacted to a post in a topic: Is this Chinese or Japanese?
  2.    Out2gtcha reacted to a post in a topic: Is this Chinese or Japanese?
  3. scjh
    Chinese. 為兒童們環繞世界
  4.    Kagemusha reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  5.    Harold reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  6.    SharkOwl reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  7. scjh
    The AOA vane on late C-Config ROCAF F-5Es (sharknose, RWR, etc.) moved to the port side above the emergency entrance door to accomodate refueling probe installation (though they were not installed). Early ROCAF F-5Es are known as the K-Config (conical nose, skyspot rod antenna, etc.). I believe F-5Es with refueling probe installed on the starboard side would also have the AOA vane on the port side. SC
  8.    Luca reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  9.    Menelaos reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  10.    Harold reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  11.    David66 reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  12.    Daniel Leduc reacted to a post in a topic: Kitty Hawk 1/32 F-5E/F Tiger II / Special Interest Group (SIG) !
  13. scjh
    I think the KH cockpit floor might be too shallow. Here is the approximate cross section at Y=229.5 for both Hasegawa (green) and KH (blue) kits, and T-38 rear cockpit (red) near the same position. (I believe the T-38 rear cockpit is similar to the single seater cockpit, please confirm.) Looks like the Hasegawa cockpit floor is more accurate in depth, but the side consoles are too low, whereas the KH side consoles are more accurate in height, but the floor is too high (when compared to the T-38 rear cockpit). Each grid spacing is one inch. This will probably affect fitting in accurate sized AM seat. Back in post #554, Daniel's photos show the KH seat as being shorter than the CAM seat. The port side console kit cross sections are taller because of the throttle controls. SC
  14. scjh
    A few more observations. The Skyspot Antenna on the spine closely behind the canopy is not on the later F-5Es. The IFF Antenna right next to the nose landing gear well door is not on the early F-5Es. It is usually upgraded with the front and rear RWR and CDS at the same time. See post #601 above to see both configs. The battery access door on the starbord avionics bay should be closer to the RWR receiver. There are older configs wtih two doors on the starboard side, and newer configs with one each on both port and starboard sides, in which case on the port side the acess door would be further back from the RWR receiver. The Gravity Fuel Fillers on the spine should be on the port side (as correctly indicated on the KH decal placement guide), instead of on the starboard side. SC
  15. scjh
    I got the kit a few days ago, and noticed that the doors to the fold-out boarding steps and external canopy handle are also on the starboard side when they should only be on the port side. Hasegawa did this too. Also the oval panel of the AOA probe is below the canopy emergency release access instead of above. SC
×
×
  • Create New...