thierry laurent Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 I'm still waiting for my issue but I've read on a French forum that the last copy of Model Aircraft Monthly (renamed Military Aircraft Monthly) has a article explaining that the last zeros built by Nakajima (A6M5 & 7...) used a differently shaped and shorter tail than the original Mitsubishi one. The difference would be more or less 20cm in length! I'm waiting for the mag to read this but saying I'm litteraly speechless would be an understatement... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagemusha Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Sounds to me like the musings of someone with too much time on their hands, just like the one where someone else wrote the whole of Shakespeare's cannon and then let him put his name to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssculptor Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 The rumor that the later model Zeros produced by Nakajima were 20 cm shorter is both correct and incorrect. Yes, the aircraft were shorter, but not by 20 CM. The correct length modification was 200 cm. Yes, it took place in the after part of the fuselage. To compensate for this shortness the engine nacell was extended 200 cm forward. Thus the aircraft kept its overall original length. Early test flights showed this design to be flawed, so the wings, tail and cockpit were reversed and a pusher propeller substituted for the tractor type. This version flew very well and actually entered squadron use. There was a decided advantage to this design as allied fighter pilots could never shoot any down because it was so hard to figure out if they were flying forward or backwards. The war ended before these Super Zeros could have much impact on the aerial situation. The two Japanese design-engineers responsible for this design escaped from Japan in the confusion of the occupation. One made his way to the United States where he was hired by the Studebaker Corporation as an automobile designer. He was influential in the design of the 1950 Studebaker where the rear of the car looked like it was the front so people could not tell if it was coming or going. The other designer surfaced in Italy where he designed the noted 1949 Gozoni-Bagward. I have it on good authority that an After Market manufacturer is about to come out with a modification kit to convert Revell's, Hasegawa's and Tamiya's Zeros into this ingenious aircraft. The cost will be a modest $172.50 MSRP as the only parts from the original kit that will be utilized will be the pilot. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rigor Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 does anybody have pix's on this bird? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris McMillin Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 I like Stephen's take. Can you right an article! Chris... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Copperhead Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 There is a lengthy discussion of this issue over on Modeling Madness. I can't tell you that there is anything useful there, but it is entertaining. http://s3.zetaboards.com/readersforum/topic/7241985/1/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssculptor Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 I like Stephen's take. Can you right an article!Chris... It would be fun to build one of these. That tail wheel will be on a very looooooong stalk. I can even make mechanical drawings of it. All I have left in the stash, however, are built up Zeros. Question: How can I remove the decals that have been on the model for the past 30 years? Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KAGNEW Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Steven someone beat you to yor model of modified Zero . looks good thou but i'm still counting the rivots for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesMetz Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 My theory is that Gaston Marty is paid by The Onion. Charles Metz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thierry laurent Posted August 13, 2009 Author Share Posted August 13, 2009 Frankly, I don't know how to react. I'd like to have facts to support such a theory. Comparing pictures is not very serious to support such a claim. After having read comments from Jim Lansdale and other knowledgeable guys on j-aircraft, I'm suspicious to say the least... However, all of us know examples of myths that have been destroyed by recent discoveries... Wait and see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_Kevin Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 I think having the name Gaston Marty attached to these claims does for their credibility roughly what that iceberg did for the Titanic... Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee White Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 The rumor that the later model Zeros produced by Nakajima were 20 cm shorter is both correct and incorrect. Yes, the aircraft were shorter, but not by 20 CM. The correct length modification was 200 cm. Yes, it took place in the after part of the fuselage. To compensate for this shortness the engine nacell was extended 200 cm forward. Thus the aircraft kept its overall original length. Early test flights showed this design to be flawed, so the wings, tail and cockpit were reversed and a pusher propeller substituted for the tractor type. This version flew very well and actually entered squadron use. There was a decided advantage to this design as allied fighter pilots could never shoot any down because it was so hard to figure out if they were flying forward or backwards. The war ended before these Super Zeros could have much impact on the aerial situation. The two Japanese design-engineers responsible for this design escaped from Japan in the confusion of the occupation. One made his way to the United States where he was hired by the Studebaker Corporation as an automobile designer. He was influential in the design of the 1950 Studebaker where the rear of the car looked like it was the front so people could not tell if it was coming or going. The other designer surfaced in Italy where he designed the noted 1949 Gozoni-Bagward. I have it on good authority that an After Market manufacturer is about to come out with a modification kit to convert Revell's, Hasegawa's and Tamiya's Zeros into this ingenious aircraft. The cost will be a modest $172.50 MSRP as the only parts from the original kit that will be utilized will be the pilot. Stephen Somebody please help me with my math- I thought that there was 100 cm in a meter- therefore, a 200cm plug taken out of the rear of a zero would be equal to 6'6" for us yanks- and a corresponding forward plug would make for one fugly zero. edit- nevermind, i stopped and read Stephen's account more closely- I should read posts more closely before asking Q's!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juggernut Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 I'm no expert but I've studied the aircraft and my personal opinion is that the shorter tailed Nakajima built zero's is a load of bushwah.....(aka crap). I've read the j-aircraft.com thread and I'm not convinced. There's too many uknowns and assumptions and not nearly enough facts, supported by documentation and evidence. I can't even discern if it's the vertical tail the guy's talking about or the distance between frame 7 and the vertical tail or the stinger on the end of the tail....it's a load of crap. Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now