Jump to content

Elger

LSP_Members
  • Content Count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. I bought a copy of the Revell kit to see if this would be possible and I think it is. In fact, in hindsight it might have been a better idea than using the HK models nose on the Tamiya kit which I did last year. (https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235034678-132-mosquito-biv-tamiya-vi-with-hk-models-iv-nose/) The HK front fuselage fits the Tamiya rear fuselage and wings with relative ease - but it looks like Revell's wing shape is considerably closer to Tamiya so it should be even easier. The HK canopy also fits Revell, for what its worth, and may be easier to install than a vacuum formed canopy. Revell's front fuselage side windows are terrible but at least they're too big (HK's are too small) so it's a relatively simple matter of making them smaller - maybe even simply with some clever masking. My brand new Revell kit's bomber front window has a crack in it so if I ever use that it will need some replacement. It's also possible (theoretically) to adapt the HK B.XVI nacelle parts to the Tamiya kit; if you have Tamiya's export version it comes with a double set of engine nacelle covers (one clear set and one regular styrene) and you could use the front part of those clear double top sections to extend the regular styrene top sections of the engine nacelle, and use the HK side panels and lower panel. As you can tell, I've played around with this idea; if I were planning a mk.IV bomber/recon version I would use the Revell front fuselage (with replacement clear parts). While it is possible to convert it to a 2-stage Merlin version by adding the HK B.XVI side and lower nacelle parts and extending the Tamiya top section that's just too much trouble for me at this point - and it would involve no less than 3 large (and 2 of those 3 rather expensive) kits: rear fuselage and wings from Tamiya, side & lower engine nacelle covers and canopy from HK Models, and front fuselage section from Revell. Personally, I'm going to wait and see if Tamiya will come out with a bomber version (the photoetch in the kit suggests they are planning it) and if then I want to build a 2-stage Merlin variant I'll decide if I want to use the HK Models engine cover parts if no alternative is available.
  2. This flow chart is reproduced in Donald Nijboer's Graphic War and shows how the different Merlin variants are related: Unfortunately, the image is just too small to read the print that explains the differences between the sub-series (21, 23, 25, etc). It seems to indicate that the main difference between these sub types is at the bottom of the compressor - but other differences are also indicated. I wonder if anyone has a copy of the original?
  3. I didn't mind splurging a little on the set. It is expensive, but the parts are an improvement over the kit parts. Whether the improvement justifies the cost is another matter. Here are some pictures comparing the resin to the kit parts: here's my completed one:
  4. If you're a purist there are reasons to not go for the Hobbyboss 1/32 Spitfire Vb. The front windscreen is wrong for the type - this is the most obvious issue. Of note is also the spine cross section behind the cockpit, which is very round while it should be somewhat flat on the top. The fuselage also looks a little bit fat. But in terms of engineering and detail it's a great kit.
  5. Oh that sounds interesting! Are the Mosquito engine bearers accurate for an early Spitfire too?
  6. Not a bad idea but it will need a little more work than that. First of all, a Tamiya IX would make more sense because it comes with the fixed tail wheel - the VIII kit only comes with the retractable tail wheel which wasn't fitted to the V. The IX kit is also cheaper. The Hobbyboss wings fit the Tamiya Spitfire fuselage really quite well, which would be necessary for making a Vb (since the Tamiya IX comes with a C wing). If you wanted to make a Vc, you could use the Tamiya wings but would need to fill the area of the Tamiya oil cooler replace it with the small oil cooler type. Alternatively, for a Vc, you could cross kit a Revell mk I and mk IX and source the Vokes filter and prop and spinner from somewhere else, maybe Hasegawa - but that would be a cheaper and simpler solution for a Vc. But you asked about a Vb - in that case the easiest way (if you insist on using a Tamiya fuselage - rather than building a Hasegawa or Hobbyboss kit out of the box) is by using a Tamiya main fuselage, Hobbyboss nose panels and wings. If you don't like the Hobbyboss wings, Hasegawa's Vb wings also fit the Tamiya fuselage quite well, but it has (fine) raised panel lines. The Hobbyboss nose panels are cut off at the same point at the Tamiya nose panels. The side panels fit quite well, but the top panel of Hobbyboss is a bit wider than the Tamiya nose. I don't know how the Hobbyboss Vokes filter would fit, but if you use the Hobbyboss wing I don't imagine the fit would be terrible.
  7. Elger

    P-51D

    On the other hand, at a fraction of the cost, Revell offers a lot of bang for your buck. Revell has fewer options than Tamiya though - no engine, and in the current edition, only the early tail. Tamiya comes with an engine and early and late tail.
  8. Regarding the Revell kit, if you're not concerned with the kit's inaccuracies, the only thing other than following the instructions that can be mentioned are parts 84A (on sprue b ) and A26. These are marked "not for use" in the instructions but in fact they can/should be fitted to the radiators - they fit sort of diagonally as sloping roofs in front of the actual radiators. Fit them left and right to the lower wing section. When I built mine I found this thread useful. Pictures are gone (photobucket) but the text is still there: https://forum.largescalemodeller.com/topic/1313-group-buildreview-revell-132-bf-109g-6-stage-3-complete/
  9. It only has the broad propellers. It also comes with later (bigger) main wheels, and a few different clear parts for the gondola. https://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/rm/kit_rg_4836.shtml
  10. looking good! what's going on with the oil tank section just in front of the windscreen? Looks like a darker plastic.
  11. Some other thoughts on the 110 that I'm not sure have been addressed in the thread: A couple of years ago I used the horrible Large Scale Conversions set on the Dragon kit which left me with little desire to ever build a 110 in 1/32 scale again. big vs smaller rudder: I think this might have to do with the introduction of SN-2 radar after the spring of 1944. Not sure, but this is what I recall having read somewhere. So a G dayfighter might have had the smaller rudder. The LSC set missed the semicircular vent underneath the nose. Eduard also missed this in their 1/48 model. Eduard also made the mistake in their 1/48 kit of not giving their model the right 20mm cannons with the proper ammo feed. Another difference between the 20 mm cannons fitted to the 110G is that they did not use the air bottles supplied in that kit. You might want to try to get in touch with Tony Ceulemans about the pecularities of the 110G. I once saw a Powerpoint presentation by him in which he discussed the bumps on the cowl of the different sub types of 110Gs. On Hyperscale some time ago he pointed out some issues with the then new 1/48 Eduard kit: Tony was very helpful in my research. If someone would like his email address, send me PM. He's the man to talk to about 110G variants.
  12. I've always wondered about the radar set up on Helmut Lent's aircraft (<<G9+AF). This is how it's presented in all the profiles I've seen but I've seen a photo of this aircraft and it's captioned as having been taken in the summer of 1943. But SN2 didn't become available until the spring of 1944. The photo I know does not show the radar but if it was indeed taken in the summer of 1943 then it should have FuG202. Unless the photo was captioned incorrectly of course. Or is there another photo of this aircraft (that I don't know of) that does show this layout?
  13. umm. guys, AIMS just posted this on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1611805322204677&id=1246247558760457
  14. thanks! in theory you should be able to fit the front end of a Revell kit to the Tamiya airframe to convert it to a bomber. It would have been considerably cheaper, but I didn't want to bother with a vac canopy mainly. Besides, I honestly think that the HK models kit isn't that bad. I think that the main canopy looks great, even compared to most other kit options in any scale, and I'm very curious how my front side "window fix" will turn out. As I mention in the thread, if it wasn't for my intention of adding a Brassin engine, I probably wouldn't have bothered with adding the Tamiya wings and fuselage. I just got the new IX kit with the intention of one day building it as a USAAF PR.XVI, pretty much OOB.
  15. I'm trying to make that happen by currently working on attaching an HK Models nose to a Tamiya airframe. Not very far yet, but building it here: http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235025780-132-mosquito-biv-tamiya-with-hk-models-nose-what-have-i-done/ So yes, Tamiya will announce a bomber version (why not with optional 2-stage Merlins while they're at it) as soon as I finish this.
×
×
  • Create New...