Jump to content

Elger

LSP_Members
  • Content Count

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Elger

  • Rank
    LSP Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I bought a copy of the Revell kit to see if this would be possible and I think it is. In fact, in hindsight it might have been a better idea than using the HK models nose on the Tamiya kit which I did last year. (https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235034678-132-mosquito-biv-tamiya-vi-with-hk-models-iv-nose/) The HK front fuselage fits the Tamiya rear fuselage and wings with relative ease - but it looks like Revell's wing shape is considerably closer to Tamiya so it should be even easier. The HK canopy also fits Revell, for what its worth, and may be ea
  2. This flow chart is reproduced in Donald Nijboer's Graphic War and shows how the different Merlin variants are related: Unfortunately, the image is just too small to read the print that explains the differences between the sub-series (21, 23, 25, etc). It seems to indicate that the main difference between these sub types is at the bottom of the compressor - but other differences are also indicated. I wonder if anyone has a copy of the original?
  3. I didn't mind splurging a little on the set. It is expensive, but the parts are an improvement over the kit parts. Whether the improvement justifies the cost is another matter. Here are some pictures comparing the resin to the kit parts: here's my completed one:
  4. If you're a purist there are reasons to not go for the Hobbyboss 1/32 Spitfire Vb. The front windscreen is wrong for the type - this is the most obvious issue. Of note is also the spine cross section behind the cockpit, which is very round while it should be somewhat flat on the top. The fuselage also looks a little bit fat. But in terms of engineering and detail it's a great kit.
  5. Oh that sounds interesting! Are the Mosquito engine bearers accurate for an early Spitfire too?
  6. Not a bad idea but it will need a little more work than that. First of all, a Tamiya IX would make more sense because it comes with the fixed tail wheel - the VIII kit only comes with the retractable tail wheel which wasn't fitted to the V. The IX kit is also cheaper. The Hobbyboss wings fit the Tamiya Spitfire fuselage really quite well, which would be necessary for making a Vb (since the Tamiya IX comes with a C wing). If you wanted to make a Vc, you could use the Tamiya wings but would need to fill the area of the Tamiya oil cooler replace it with the small oil cooler type. Alt
  7. On the other hand, at a fraction of the cost, Revell offers a lot of bang for your buck. Revell has fewer options than Tamiya though - no engine, and in the current edition, only the early tail. Tamiya comes with an engine and early and late tail.
  8. Regarding the Revell kit, if you're not concerned with the kit's inaccuracies, the only thing other than following the instructions that can be mentioned are parts 84A (on sprue b ) and A26. These are marked "not for use" in the instructions but in fact they can/should be fitted to the radiators - they fit sort of diagonally as sloping roofs in front of the actual radiators. Fit them left and right to the lower wing section. When I built mine I found this thread useful. Pictures are gone (photobucket) but the text is still there: https://forum.largescalemodeller.com/topic/1313-group-bu
  9. It only has the broad propellers. It also comes with later (bigger) main wheels, and a few different clear parts for the gondola. https://www.cybermodeler.com/hobby/kits/rm/kit_rg_4836.shtml
  10. looking good! what's going on with the oil tank section just in front of the windscreen? Looks like a darker plastic.
  11. I've always wondered about the radar set up on Helmut Lent's aircraft (<<G9+AF). This is how it's presented in all the profiles I've seen but I've seen a photo of this aircraft and it's captioned as having been taken in the summer of 1943. But SN2 didn't become available until the spring of 1944. The photo I know does not show the radar but if it was indeed taken in the summer of 1943 then it should have FuG202. Unless the photo was captioned incorrectly of course. Or is there another photo of this aircraft (that I don't know of) that does show this layout?
  12. thanks! in theory you should be able to fit the front end of a Revell kit to the Tamiya airframe to convert it to a bomber. It would have been considerably cheaper, but I didn't want to bother with a vac canopy mainly. Besides, I honestly think that the HK models kit isn't that bad. I think that the main canopy looks great, even compared to most other kit options in any scale, and I'm very curious how my front side "window fix" will turn out. As I mention in the thread, if it wasn't for my intention of adding a Brassin engine, I probably wouldn't have bothered with adding the Tamiya wings
  13. I'm trying to make that happen by currently working on attaching an HK Models nose to a Tamiya airframe. Not very far yet, but building it here: http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235025780-132-mosquito-biv-tamiya-with-hk-models-nose-what-have-i-done/ So yes, Tamiya will announce a bomber version (why not with optional 2-stage Merlins while they're at it) as soon as I finish this.
  14. What's a bigger issue for me is that it's also possible that the H-22 had a different wind screen, and a different instruments panel, as seen for example in RAF Hendon's H-20. This configuration was introduced with the H-16, and several V-1 carrying Heinkels were in fact H-16s. Chukw built a nice 111 in 1/48 scale some years ago, which features the correct configuration: http://www.arcforums.com/forums/air/index.php?/topic/71040-my-heinkel-111/ Hasegawa got this right in their 1/72 H-16 kit.
  15. I think it might be scratch built. YouTuber Plasmo did the same in 1/48 - the segment starts at around 8:55 in this video, and then again just after 10:37:
×
×
  • Create New...