Jump to content

OldTroll

LSP_Members
  • Posts

    670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OldTroll

  1. I think we may be in for a stretched out Fokker D.VII release. Given that we have three manufacturers (Fokker, OAW and Albatros) and two engines (Mercedes and BMW) and distinct differences in early/mid/late production from each manufacturer I can see at least six different model numbers being released. I do think we will see some in time for Christmas, though...perhaps right after the Sopwith Snipe!
  2. Silly Typhoon - it will be in the WIP section - LOL
  3. Sorry to hijack the Fokker D.VII/photo techniques/Brit boring camouflage thread but WNW has released their Sopwith Triplane kit. LOL - just kidding, guys but I just found number of "sub-threads" amusing. Waiting on shipping notice for my triple tripes!
  4. The primary difference between the various builder's (Fok., OAW, Alb.) versions was in the louvered panels on the engine bay and, of course, the engine itself (BMW or Mercedes.) The 3-part Fokker D.VII Anthology by Albatros Publications gives detailed explanations and illustrations of the variations, both by builder and timeframe of production.
  5. Just ordered three for me...get 'em while they're hot!
  6. It would be much more effective if these kit suggestions were submitted at the Silver Wings website...just a suggestion.
  7. "As you wish." - Westley in "The Princess Bride"
  8. Could we start a separate thread about "C.R.42 Decal Requests" and leave this thread for the Silver Wings folks to show their product and the build of same?
  9. I seem to remember that YZC and GZC were not "paints" per se but rather protective, anti-corrosion coatings - more like a varnish with the YZC/GZC powder mixed as opposed to an actual pigment/carrier mix. I think this makes the shade of the YZC/GZC "color" dependant on the metal to which it was applied since the YZC/GZC coating was somewhat translucent.
  10. Sorry, fellows, but I pleaded with them to remain WW1 pure...
  11. I must agree with Jennings - RAL 7011 seems much too dark for lettering. Based on the RAL chip site I would recommend RAL 7040 or 7042 as a good match for the grey used for squadron codes (no matter what the paint name really was.) I guess I must double-check my previously trustworthy paint cross-reference chart in the future. Thanks for the sharp eye, Jennings.
  12. Dark Green - FS595 34079 - RAL 6031 should be OK Dark Earth - FS595 30118 - RAL 8025 is close but needs a little more green in it Sky - FS595 34504 - RAL 6027 or 6034 might do Medium Sea Grey - FS595 36270 - RAL 7011 is good Roundel Blue (Dull) - FS595 35048 - RAL 5013 or 5000 might do Roundel Red (Dull) - FS595 30109 - RAL 8003 is close but needs to be darker with more red Roundel Yellow - FS595 33538 - RAL 1003, 1017, 1018 are all good. I hope this helps.
  13. By mid-1940 the "standard" scheme would be Dark Green and Dark Earth uppers in either the 'A' or reverse 'B' pattern. Undersides would be one of the "Sky" variations. Roundels on the upper surfaces would be Red/Blue. Undersurfaces could have no roundels or have Red/White/Blue ones. The fuselage roundels would be Red/White/Blue/Yellow but the overall size and the proportions of the rings could vary. There were several variations of fin flash, all being Red/White/Blue with Blue at the hinge. Squadron/Aircraft codes would be in Medium Sea Grey and also varied in size, shape and style. As is almost always the case it is best to have photos and/or other references for the specific aircraft being modeled. I recommend "The Battle of Britain On Target Special" by the former Aviation Workshop Publications. I believe all their publication inventory went to Hannant's upon the cessation of operations. I hope this gets you pointed in the right general direction.
  14. Wingnut Wings is offering most, if not all, of the engines from their kits as separate items. Just the ticket for upgrading other manufacturers' kits or for quick insertion into a (mostly) scratchbuilt item. Prices seemed quite reasonable.
  15. Brilliant finish to a most interesting project. Well done!
  16. How about going for a clean sweep this year with a Siskin, Bulldog and a Gamecock? Your products are exquisite and your awards are well-deserved. Keep up the great work.
  17. One of the most stunning models I have ever seen. Your investment in time (and rubles) has certainly given a great return. Certainly a front runner for Build of the Year(s) award!
  18. Wow! Who would have thought that clunky Tamiya kit could be made to look so good? Joke, just a joke... Seriously, that is a gorgeous end result with a beautiful (understated) weathered finish. Bravo Zulu!
  19. Right on, Stephen! I can narrow it a bit more by not wanting a model of any aircraft first flown after 1935. That should narrow the manufacturers field to Wingnut Wings and Silver Wings and I already have a lifetime subscription to their 1:32 products. This has been a supplement by your friendly old grump to the above public service announcement by your friendly know-it-all - now back to my 1:32 Douglas O-2H (dans du papier.)
  20. You could do the "paper-to-plastic" challenge with Skyline Paper Models F2H-3.
  21. The resin wicker seat may be a Pheon product?
  22. Thanks, DaneBramage - there is no such thing as too much cowbell and too many B-25 threads!
  23. Oh, that weathering is so fine! In a world of over-weathered and over-presprayed panels this model shines like the sun.
  24. Check out eCardmodels for some 1:48 scale F3H models. I recommend them not because they are card models but because one may be helpful in determining cross-sections. If you enlarged them by 150% and substituted styrene sheet they might make a good "foundation" for a more detailed rendering of the aircraft.
×
×
  • Create New...