Jump to content

Talon

LSP_Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Talon

  1. Attacked by 3 x 109s, lost your wingman, and you're still flying straight and level?! You're gonna get kilt! Who comes up with the boxart?!
  2. I do, but anything you might have that would help I am - that was part of the motivation behind getting this progressing again.
  3. Progress happening slower than I would like, as only able to do between the paying job and family stuff Rear cockpit Rear instrument panel and coaming Front instrument panel (not complete and coaming will follow)
  4. It sort of is. It requires me to finish the CAD. Taking a little longer than planned, but there has been a lot of progress and a change in design philosophy on my part. The ladders have been released under Phase Hangar Resin. The cockpit will be under Flying Leathernecks.
  5. If the kit age being over 25 counts then I'll jump in with the big Hasegawa OA-4M (released in 1987), posted elsewhere here, as I'm trying to get the cockpit CAD done, to be able to actually progress this again
  6. Lynn has been involved in the development of this kit for some time already.
  7. It's all about perspective and relativity. If I was earning Euros and buying in Euros at that price, comparatively it's a lot cheaper.
  8. Here is a good primer that touches on some of the issues from Chuck's great build. http://www.arcforums.com/forums/air/index.php?/topic/262693-132-trumpeter-a-10c-hog-putting-lipstick-on-a-pig-of-a-kit/&do=findComment&comment=2492209 My own build in progress with the Squadron vac https://forum.largescaleplanes.com/index.php?/topic/91571-sows-ear-updating-backdating-correcting-and-detailing-the-trumpeter-132-warthog/&do=findComment&comment=1316088
  9. Dave isn't talking about the mould flaws, he is referring to the framing issues - both the windscreen and canopy shapes and framing in the Trumpeter kit are quite wrong and pretty well documented. Squadron/Falcon did an updated vac-form set some years ago which fixed the issue. Let me see if I can find the info you need, but would be good if you could actually do corrected items instead of just cleaned up kit items?
  10. Last weekend to get those orders in for this one. Kotare have just posted a cutoff of Sunday night
  11. For those not aware, Kotare have made an announcement about an offer of the model for those attending the US Nats. Head over to the Kotare Models Facebook page for full details https://www.facebook.com/kotaremodels
  12. Don't know what stores load you are planning, but I've designed accurate 1/32 3D printed Python IIIs and F-15 launch rails, which are now also available through Mike over at Phase Hangar Resin. https://phasehangarresin.com/collections/32001-1-32/products/32015-rafael-python-iii-missile-2 Note that the adaptors come with the correct style LAU-7s attached as well. https://phasehangarresin.com/collections/32001-1-32/products/32016-python-iii-pylon-adapter-f-15-eagle
  13. I completely removed both tabs - the ones you label A & B. They get in the way and cause bad fit
  14. For those who may have missed it, Kotare Models have posted a hints and tips sheet on the website to help you get the best out of your Spitfire build Link here https://website.static-files.net/uploaded/a2d0dabf-k32001 kotare 1-32 spitfire mk.ia mid hints tips v1.2.jpg
  15. For all those wanting 1/32 pylons, I have been advised let you know to go to Mike at Phase Hangar Resin. note that you need to specify which version you need as there are 3: - A-10A/A+ - A-10C - A-10 early (FSD) with sway brace fairings
  16. Phase Hangar Resin sells Flight Line Resin. My pylons were a one off that Richard printed for me (along with the early pylon mods), but if you ask, he will likely come to some agreement on pricing/availability with you.
  17. Interview starts 1.30 ish - worth a listen either way.
  18. You have nailed it exactly. It fits exactly like it is supposed to. Don't paint the mating surfaces. But that should be true of any styrene join where you use solvent cement
  19. You no longer have to take my word for it - listen in and you will learn why it was done, straight from Richard and Darren at Kotare, including "deliberate sink marks". I'm sure you'll try and refute the wording, but trust me, they are by design, and they are sink marks. https://spruecuttersu.buzzsprout.com/1776945/12688972-episode-43-unicorns-and-rainbow-farts-featuring-richard-and-darren-from-kotare-models
  20. I didn't drop it much, but by fixing the back end of the wing changes the shape a little as you can see that the wing in the kit is a little too curved as it is. Here is the spars and the wing attached in mine
  21. Nice work to date. Looking spectacular. I did add spars, not just to strengthen the wings, but I also lowered the wings as they sit too high on the fuselage, and the new spars helped to get the position right
  22. The pylons and the engine intakes are the work of Richard VanZandt, although I did collaborate on the pylons with Richard to make a few adjustments and improvements, as well as to modify the outer pylons with the early sway brace sharkfin fairings.
  23. The AB and C refers to the markings options. Instructions show the seat and frame for options A and B as green (b colour drop), but for C as black (d colour drop) for seat parts B7, B8 and B9, so only one documented example of the three is black. Seat padding black on all 3. Armour callout shows as green, silver or black, but suggests black as likely. Lots of notes in the instructions on the reasons for the choices. This one, the armour is likely white or silver, not the interior green colour. You can clearly see the fuselage frame and pilot's door next to the armour, not in shadow, is interior green (darker grey than the armour)
×
×
  • Create New...