Uncarina Posted December 14, 2023 Author Posted December 14, 2023 (edited) I’ve assembled and added the tailplane assembly. The only tricky part was that the tailplane module didn’t fit flush against the fuselage rear due to the upper fuselage piece projected a hair past the rest of the pieces, so a light sanding took care of this. Otherwise the assembly was straightforward with an impressive fit and engineering. The kit comes with two tailwheels with the same part numbers and no indication which to include. Should I use the smaller one? Cheers, Tom Edited December 14, 2023 by Uncarina Tolga ULGUR, Landrotten Highlander, Dennis7423 and 15 others 18
MikeMaben Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 (edited) Don't think so Tom, the earliest 190s, prototype thru early As had smaller tailwheels The prototype V series had very small tailwheels. It looks like the smaller one will be for the early A Basic series. ...maybe . I'd use the bigger one. Weird tho, the larger one looks kinda too big. Edited December 15, 2023 by MikeMaben Martinnfb and Uncarina 1 1
Furie Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 (edited) Hello Tom. I haven’t read anything about tailwheels on the FW 190. Instinctively I would rather take the smaller one. I looked at my documentation but the only interesting thing is A-4 profiles B&Y that will allow you to compare the size of this tailwheel compared to the rest of the plane. Tell me if you’re interested. Edited December 15, 2023 by Furie Uncarina, daHeld and Martinnfb 3
Uncarina Posted December 15, 2023 Author Posted December 15, 2023 6 hours ago, MikeMaben said: Don't think so Tom, the earliest 190s, prototype thru early As had smaller tailwheels The prototype V series had very small tailwheels. It looks like the smaller one will be for the early A Basic series. ...maybe . I'd use the bigger one. Weird tho, the larger one looks kinda too big. Thanks Mike! I looked in Valiant wings and didn’t see anything to indicate a size change among the versions. 4 hours ago, Furie said: Hello Tom. I haven’t read anything about tailwheels on the FW 190. Instinctively I would rather take the smaller one. I looked at my documentation but the only interesting thing is A-4 profiles B&Y that will allow you to compare the size of this tailwheel compared to the rest of the plane. Tell me if you’re interested. Denis, thanks! That would give me a point of reference. And it hadn’t occurred to me, but I will check the Valiant Wings drawings as well. Cheers, Tom Martinnfb and daHeld 2
Furie Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 Here’s what I got, Tom. But I don’t know if that will help you. Uncarina, Martinnfb and daHeld 2 1
D.B. Andrus Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 I'd go with the small one, Tom. Great work! Damian daHeld, Uncarina, Martinnfb and 7 others 7 3
denders Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 I can't find anything about differences in tail wheel size changes in the references I have set out for my build in the GB. I found it listed as 350mm x 135mm. I do note that looking at photographs there seems to be differences in the amount of clearance between tire and the landing gear strut. Maybe that helps? Uncarina and daHeld 2
MDuv Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 Hi In the hasegawa A5 boxing, there are 2 tail wheels as well. One is located on the original sprues originated from the D9, and is of 11,9mm diameter. There is another one on the "new" sprues produced for the Anton series and is approx 11.1 diameter. Hasegawa instructions direct to use the 11.1 for the A series. Maybe there something similar in ZM boxing. daHeld, Shiba and Uncarina 3
Uncarina Posted December 15, 2023 Author Posted December 15, 2023 Denis, Damian, Dave, Mathieu, Thank you all very much! I was going to go by the clearance with the strut, but based on your photos Damian and the Hasegawa instructions from Mathieu I feel more confident going with the smaller one. Glad I prepped both! Cheers, Tom
monthebiff Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 Looking really good and fast progress indeed! Looks like ZM have pretty well gone the same construction route as their Ta-152 but it all fits properly! Practice makes perfect I guess. Regards. Andy Uncarina 1
Uncarina Posted December 15, 2023 Author Posted December 15, 2023 18 minutes ago, monthebiff said: Looking really good and fast progress indeed! Looks like ZM have pretty well gone the same construction route as their Ta-152 but it all fits properly! Practice makes perfect I guess. Regards. Andy Thanks Andy! Yes, so far so good with the fit. I am really looking forward to seeing how the engine module/cowling fits with the fuselage, but I haven't seen any significant challenges so far. Cheers, Tom
Uncarina Posted December 16, 2023 Author Posted December 16, 2023 (edited) One of the defining characteristics of ZM kits is shown here: The detail and fit of the internal structure is impressive, and fortunately the upper and lower wing sections have a great fit as well. Note that the wings and tailplanes are just dry-fitted to the fuselage. You have an option of whether or not to omit the outer guns; I included them based on photos, but it looks like JG-54 190’s didn’t always have them. Next we’ll see how well the wings fit to the fuselage. Cheers, Tom Edited January 19, 2024 by Uncarina Dpgsbody55, denders, Greg W and 17 others 20
MikeMaben Posted December 16, 2023 Posted December 16, 2023 23 hours ago, MikeMaben said: Don't think so Tom, the earliest 190s, prototype thru early As had smaller tailwheels The prototype V series had very small tailwheels. It looks like the smaller one will be for the early A Basic series. ...maybe . I'd use the bigger one. Weird tho, the larger one looks kinda too big. I couldn't find anything on tailwheel sizes either. (quoting myself) The bigger one does look too big. Good thing you ignored my ambiguous answer . Uncarina 1
Uncarina Posted December 16, 2023 Author Posted December 16, 2023 7 hours ago, MikeMaben said: I couldn't find anything on tailwheel sizes either. (quoting myself) The bigger one does look too big. Good thing you ignored my ambiguous answer . No worries Mike, you meant well! Cheers, Tom MikeMaben 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now