Bill Cross Posted Monday at 03:10 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 03:10 PM On 5/20/2023 at 9:01 PM, Finn said: Look here: https://public.fotki.com/tsumner/scale-modeling/revetments/ on page 2 there are a couple of drawings giving dimensions. Jari Thanks, Jari, that is very helpful. Also some good photos of them. There was some question if they were ever painted, and it doesn't look as though they were. Also a question whether the builders used loose earth of sandbags. Clearly not the latter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thierry laurent Posted Monday at 06:16 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:16 PM Hi again, Along the years, I also collected a lot of information about such Armco Steel Wall Revetments. We already discussed that in...2012 and, in 2018, there was a more detailed thread ("South East Asia revetments question " in the General discussion forum) but it disappeared! I guess the original poster had asked for removing his contents and as far as I know this erased fully the threads he created. Hopefully I had saved it for whatever reason and here's what I posted at that time: "Hi, You are lucky as I studied seriously that topic some years ago! Well, unfortunately, the Lone Star wall set is not accurate for a SEA version :-( I was quite disappointed to see it when I got them. It looks they based their set on drawings available on the web and did not double check with wartime pictures. I guess the problem came from the fact the initial prototypes tested in the US (such as Hill AFB) had more sections and consequently the initial manual views reflected that. A normal SEA wall was made of nine embossed horizontal sections of steel sheet. Alas, the Lone Star vacformed wall has 11 or 12 of them (I do not remember). A missed opportunity! Have a look here for a comparison between the CONUS and SEA types and also some information about the way they were built: http://public.fotki.com/tsumner/scale-modeling/revetments/ There is at least one manual describing the construction of such walls: the Field Manual 5-15 - Field Fortifications document from 27th of June 1972. A company named Armco Inc. built such pre-fabricated steel sheets. They were named "Armco Steel Wall Revetment". Armco revetment was delivered in packages combining a series of 10 foot interlocking sections. The sheets were 12 feet high and 10 feet wide (with the poles) and the smaller end sheets had a 5 feet 6 inches width (poles included). Such Armco made pre-fabricated steel sheets were bolted together with hollow steel column posts to make walls. The hollow walls were then filled with earth/laterite and theoretically capped with a thin layer of two inches of concrete. Earth was prefered whereas the manual indicated that sand should be used to fill the walls for a simple reason: the sand went out of the walls from the creases between the sheets and poles. So, this asked for the use of some specific material to fill the seams whereas this was not a problem when earth was used. Hence, for a SEA diorama, either simulate earth/laterite color or concrete color but not sand. This use of earth rather than sand even in Vietnam coastal areas is confirmed by Seabees reports. Typically, for "small" planes bays, the side wall length was made of seven to eigth sections as they were made when the Air Force was using shorter planes than the F-105 or Phantoms (e.g. Supersabres). For the width (the rear), it does not look there were hard rules. This really depended on the bases. Some just used the side walls without rear wall, some had single plane bays whereas others put two planes in one larger bay. Moreover, the separation walls between bays were sometimes built against the middle of a section of the rear wall of the bay. So you could for instance have a bay with 7.5 sections of rear wall. Here is a view of the components: http://public.fotki.com/tsumner/scale-modeling/revetments/diagram1.html#media With regard to Phantoms, I found pictures of single plane bays in Ubon, Udorn, Bien Hoa, Tuy Hoa and Phan Rang and larger (two planes) bays in Ubon, Cam Ranh, Bien Hoa, Phan Rang, etc. Globally, I would not really worry about the type of bays as planes moved between bases and even on the same base. Nonetheless, keep in mind there were not that common on some bases. For instance, Da Nang mainly relied on covered plane shelters. The best thing to do is to try to find pictures of the base you want to replicate, check the era and do a search for an aerial view of the base at that time period. Another tool I used was Google earth as many walls are still there! Note that some pictures on the web actually show eighties Phantoms parked in revetments in Korean bases such as Kunsan. Last, it looks like the walls had various hues of satin - metallic mid to dark grey colors. However, on some bases, a kind of brick red primer was seen or even a dark olive paint was used (as in Ubon). " I did not find a lot of additional relevant information since that time. However, I went back to that topic yesterday and looked at my pictures. Very often the walls were not painted but the surface quickly oxydized and got a dark grey dull color. I think this explains the grey colors. Sometimes they were painted with a color that looks to be black (possibly to avoid corroding effects in very wet environments) but that color became lighter with the sun! So, between the oxydized metal and the black color that changed here and there because of the sun, it is quite difficult to specify a definite color hue! I have at least twenty color pictures taken in SEA and the variety of color effects is obvious. So, if you use variations of dark dull greys, you should be OK! Note, as abovementioned, the size of the revetment varied according to the bases, the use and the type of planes (one or two fighters, one large bomber, gunship or transport plane). Some Vietnam examples (depth x width): Can Ranh: 120ft x 120ft Tuy Hoa: 75ft x 90ft Phan Rang: 90ft x 130ft & 75ft x 50ft Bien Hoa: 90ft x 115ft & 75ft x 50ft Hth Thierry Bill Cross, LSP_K2, BiggTim and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Cross Posted Monday at 08:35 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 08:35 PM Fabulous stuff, @thierry laurent, thank you so much for sharing this. thierry laurent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Posted Tuesday at 03:14 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:14 PM There were some smaller, in height, blast walls as well: Jari BiggTim and Bill Cross 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Cross Posted Tuesday at 03:22 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 03:22 PM (edited) Anyone know what sort of matting was used? Some of the revetments were poured concrete. It's not WW2-style Marsden Matting. Edited Tuesday at 03:43 PM by Bill Cross BiggTim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thierry laurent Posted Tuesday at 04:22 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:22 PM 1 hour ago, Bill Cross said: Anyone know what sort of matting was used? Some of the revetments were poured concrete. It's not WW2-style Marsden Matting. Indeed, this is an updated type of PSP that appeared during the Vietnam War. I need to go back to my archives! Bill Cross and BiggTim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted Tuesday at 09:38 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:38 PM 6 hours ago, Bill Cross said: Anyone know what sort of matting was used? Some of the revetments were poured concrete. It's not WW2-style Marsden Matting. This particular type was most frequently seen as helicopter pad matting. BiggTim and Bill Cross 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Cross Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM That would make sense, the big jets would not be well-supported by that matting. BiggTim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted Tuesday at 09:55 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:55 PM 7 minutes ago, Bill Cross said: That would make sense, the big jets would not be well-supported by that matting. If memory serves, it's referred to as M8A1. Bill Cross and BiggTim 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Cross Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 10:03 PM Does anyone make it in either 1/32nd or 1/35th scale? I have three Hueys in my stash. BiggTim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted Tuesday at 10:53 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 10:53 PM 11 minutes ago, Bill Cross said: Does anyone make it in either 1/32nd or 1/35th scale? I have three Hueys in my stash. Not that I'm aware of. I started some in a thread here somewhere, but don't recall the scale. Bill Cross 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Posted Tuesday at 11:55 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:55 PM Here are a couple of examples of matting used in Vietnam: Jari BiggTim, Bill Cross, blackbetty and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Posted Wednesday at 01:10 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 01:10 AM Another example of matting was the AM-2 which is still in use today: Back in SEA: https://samenews.org/tme-looks-back-vietnam-aluminum-matting-runways-in-vietnam/ https://www.seabee71.com/stories/keeping-the-sats-runway-open.html looks easier to scratchbuild, full scale 12' X 2' X 1.5" thick. Jari BiggTim, thierry laurent, Bill Cross and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Cross Posted Wednesday at 01:58 PM Author Share Posted Wednesday at 01:58 PM Any of you 3D guys want to start cranking out some of this? BiggTim and LSP_K2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggTim Posted Wednesday at 09:30 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:30 PM As for the blast wall, it really would be better represented in PE metal, but I could certainly give it a shot in resin, based on the excellent references you have here. It might be a while, but if I have any success, I'll post it here. LSP_K2 and Bill Cross 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now