Jump to content

USAF Phantom Identity Crisis


Recommended Posts

You guys are waaaay overthinking this. It's simply a mistake by whoever painted the airplane.  They copied the sample data block right out of the Tech Order. Unfortunately I can't post a screenshot of the TO page, but it's identical to what is stenciled on this airplane.  

You can see it here in Peter Greengrass' post on this Facebook group:

https://m.facebook.com/groups/QF4FSAT/permalink/4090911207631663/

Edited by Scott R Wilson
Added details
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jennings Heilig said:

 


DING, DING, DING!!!  We have a WINNER!!!

 

It's frightening that there are people that dumb maintaining our military aircraft.

 

 

 

Terrifying, really! 

 

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good spot Scott! :)

 

Unfortunately, that is the nature/mentality of TO type orders...monkey see, monkey do (no disrespect here to any highly trained aircraft technicians here - I have worked (and written) both US and UK tech order/instructions, and there is, shall we say, quite a difference in how they are understood at service level! :) ).

 

Derek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...