Gazzas Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Funny thing is, this also got posted on the HK Facebook page... BTW.... I have no affiliation with HK models.... Rick Griewski, phasephantomphixer, D.B. Andrus and 3 others 3 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 OK, now that's really wrong, that second one. chrish, LSP_Matt and Rick Griewski 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kagemusha Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Yet another example of Hollywood re-writing history... ps. Probably being flown by Henry VIII, but that's for the sequel Troy Molitor, Rick Griewski, LSP_Matt and 6 others 1 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ade rowlands Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Kagemusha said: Yet another example of Hollywood re-writing history... ps. Probably being flown by Henry VIII, but that's for the sequel Enough wives for a crew too. Greif8, Royboy, scvrobeson and 6 others 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John1 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 5 hours ago, ade rowlands said: Enough wives for a crew too. They weren’t cut out for the stress of combat. When the shooting started, they lost their heads. Shoggz, Greif8, firefly7 and 6 others 3 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiggTim Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 For some reason, the pics won't load for me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.B. Andrus Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 That's a fantastic piece of boxart. Cheers, Damian adameliclem, Dennis7423, phasephantomphixer and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivanmoe Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, D.B. Andrus said: That's a fantastic piece of boxart. Cheers, Damian When I was in college, I took Art History as an elective. A visit to a local museum was part of the syllabus, so off we went one afternoon. One of the exhibits there was devoted to the work of a "hyper-realist" who painted motorcycles. Man, I honestly thought that I was looking at photographs, rather than paintings. I mentioned this to the instructor and told her how impressed that I was with the artist's work. She sorta frowned and explained that contemporary pieces like his were considered rather déclassé, and normally wouldn't be hosted in a prestigious museum like the one that we were standing in. Interestingly, in that world, the ability to "render" (her word) was assumed and not something to be celebrated. I think that conversation more or less killed high-brow art for yours truly. Edited February 9, 2021 by ivanmoe Ryan, Adrian and LSP_K2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefly7 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Same plastic, different markings ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusionreigns178 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 (edited) There's definitely something a bit off about that Lanc.... I've spotted it! The pilot's hair is longer than regulations allowed. A very serious oversight, indeed. Chris. PS: On a more serious note, I'm glad to see HK are putting more effort into their box-art. I have the B-25J Strafer and the box-art could - at best - be described as "basic". When you're spending some serious coin on these kits, a great illustration makes a lot of difference. Edited February 9, 2021 by Confusionreigns178 Amending some information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adameliclem Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 hour ago, D.B. Andrus said: That's a fantastic piece of boxart. I agree. Reminds me of the art for Airfix’s big Hellcat. Same artist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusionreigns178 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 The box-art looks like it's computer-generated, to me. Having said that, it doesn't scream CG nearly as much as many box-fronts of recent years. These things will just keep getting better with time. Chris. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-17 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 The box art appears to be by Piotr Forkasiewicz. He seems to be doing artwork for all the recent HK reboxings and some stuff for Eduard. His website is worth a browse while having a coffee/beer. https://peterfor.com/ I'm tempted to buy this reboxing, but man... I was really hoping for a 345th BG boxing. I am really disappointed by the lack of 345th markings on offer for the glass nose HK B-25. I guess the wait continues for that, the B-17F rebox, and B-17 nose section kit. adameliclem 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grunticus Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 A fine example where the box art sells the kit. Stunning. Jeff T, LSP_K2 and John Stambaugh 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Grunticus said: A fine example where the box art sells the kit. Stunning. There's no question about it, that artwork is just outstanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now