mpk Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) I am soon to begin painting my hurricane Mk.I. Before doing so, I'd like some input. I've been studying photo's on the web of BoB hurricanes. Some photo's appear to show camouflage as soft, and some hard. I'm unsure if the quality of the film is playing tricks with my eyes. Here are 2 photo's I've found of my subject. Your thoughts appreciated as always. Edited January 25, 2021 by mpk Typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dpgsbody55 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 From the factory, the edges would have been hard. They were painted using heavy masks laid over the plane to obtain the required camouflage pattern, A or B. B was the inverse of pattern A. After that, what happened in the field is a case of using whatever repainting equipment was on hand. Cheers, Michael Pete Roberts, mpk and D Bellis 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeMaben Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 They did use masks but they were mats (some say originally made of horsehair) but didn't provide a 'sharp' demarcation (depending on what one's definition of sharp is). Prewar ... Early war ... HTH coogrfan, monthebiff, mpk and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fastterry Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 I reckon you still need to use Blu Tack worms to get the effect you are after, they allow just enough overspray. TRF coogrfan and mpk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpk Posted January 25, 2021 Author Share Posted January 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Dpgsbody55 said: From the factory, the edges would have been hard. They were painted using heavy masks laid over the plane to obtain the required camouflage pattern, A or B. B was the inverse of pattern A. After that, what happened in the field is a case of using whatever repainting equipment was on hand. Cheers, Michael Thanks, Michael. 1 hour ago, MikeMaben said: They did use masks but they were mats (some say originally made of horsehair) but didn't provide a 'sharp' demarcation (depending on what one's definition of sharp is). Prewar ... Early war ... HTH Awesome. Thanks mate! 36 minutes ago, fastterry said: I reckon you still need to use Blu Tack worms to get the effect you are after, they allow just enough overspray. TRF And so I shall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozart Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 There is no definitive “correct” answer, the question has been debated by “experts” on many forums over the years. Go with whatever is your chosen method Dale, you won’t be wrong! LSP_Ron, Scotsman, LSP_K2 and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmayhew Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 couple of things - i suggest getting this book if you want an excellent resource on early Hurricanes - if going for a feathered edge, depends on how tight you can spray - if considering scale, a feathered edge is unlikely to show up in 1/32 given limitations of one's ability to spray those tight lines - feathered lines may still be aesthetically pleasing, even if not entirely accurate (I certainly find them so) but definitely get the WingLeader Photo Archive book! mozart, coogrfan, mpk and 2 others 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozart Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 55 minutes ago, nmayhew said: but definitely get the WingLeader Photo Archive book! I second that, superb reference! mpk and nmayhew 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennismcc Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 hour ago, mozart said: There is no definitive “correct” answer, the question has been debated by “experts” on many forums over the years. Go with whatever is your chosen method Dale, you won’t be wrong! I would go with Max on this one go with what you think looks right, below is a quote from Edgar. Posted 18 December 2014 - 05:07 AM This subject causes almost as much controversy as rivets. At the beginning of the war, aircraft camouflage colours were "blended," i.e. merged, but it was found that this was often done by lifting the gun away from the surface, so that paint was drying before it hit the surface, causing excess drag. At a meeting, early in 1940, Farnborough, who were the Air Ministry's source for camouflage, said that blending was a waste of time, so the Ministry sent a circular to all Resident Technical Officers, saying that mats could, in future, be used. This covered the manufacturers, and POSSIBLY the Civilian Repair Organisation, but probably not M.U.s., and certainly not the Squadrons. Mats probably caused ridges between colours, which needed smoothing down, but nothing like the roughness of the blending process, and a smooth finish was what the Ministry really wanted, but couldn't achieve with cellulose. Synthetic paint, in August 1942, was found to be smooth and matt, so was used until after the end of the war. Understandably, modellers often think of their model first, and the real thing second, and this is where the fun starts. Ideally, blended colours had a "join" only one inch (even half an inch) wide, which, in photographs, looks very prominent, but, divide that down by 72 for a model, and it comes to 1/3rd of a mm, or 1/2 a mm in 1/48, 3/4 of a mm in 1/32, even 1/24 is only 1mm, and spraying to those limits is really difficult (I've never managed it.) Ideally, taking all this into consideration, a model's finish should probably be hard-edged, but, as always, it's up to the individual, and long may that remain so. Scale32, coogrfan, mozart and 6 others 8 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldbaldguy Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 I vote for softly hard. Hardly soft works too. mozart, dmthamade, Sepp and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) The 1 inch overspray requirement has been in pretty much all RAF aircraft finishing publications since they were first published (and still are today). As Max has stated with Edgar's quote, it is difficult to achieve, though Blu tack (or similar) does go a long way to providing a degree of minimal overspray if done carefully. Good luck Derek Edited January 25, 2021 by Derek B dennismcc, LSP_K2, mpk and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 To me, for the most part, "hard edges", as in masked, just look funky, so I tend to prefer a really tight, but still soft edge, but that's just me. cmayer, Derek B, Uncarina and 4 others 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenshb Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 Does anyone have a photo of these fabled "mats" in use in British factories? To my eye, the camouflage pattern is always a little different between aircraft, and the use of mats should see an almost perfect match. Many photos show tight feathered edges, but noticeable variations in the pattern that indicates to me they were sprayed freehand. mpk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennismcc Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, jenshb said: Does anyone have a photo of these fabled "mats" in use in British factories? To my eye, the camouflage pattern is always a little different between aircraft, and the use of mats should see an almost perfect match. Many photos show tight feathered edges, but noticeable variations in the pattern that indicates to me they were sprayed freehand. There was some quite heated discussions about camouflage mats a few years back so I'll skip that one. Though there is a photo of a P40 having it's camouflage painted using mats. The camouflage patterns did vary slightly from different factories though the overall scheme and colours were the same, I came across this when modelling a Spitfire once, I had made some paper masks for a previous build but when I checked photos of the new build the pattern was slightly different so I could not use them. Cheers Dennis Edited January 26, 2021 by dennismcc mpk and RLWP 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozart Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 16 minutes ago, dennismcc said: Deleted as I pressed quote by mistake Ha ha, I've done that too Dennis.....senior moment!! mpk and dennismcc 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now