Brett M Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 On the two photos, are they the same jet? I’m seeing 3796 and 3791 on the rear fuselage. The second photo, the BuNo isn’t clear enough to read, unfortunately. AlbertD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertD Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 22 minutes ago, Brett M said: On the two photos, are they the same jet? I’m seeing 3796 and 3791 on the rear fuselage. The second photo, the BuNo isn’t clear enough to read, unfortunately. I believe they are different airplanes but they are the same squadron from the same time period. To me that still makes them a valuable reference. The plane I'm modeling is a different one still. The fuselage/hull number on mine is 13. Brett M 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggyfoos Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 4 hours ago, Brett M said: On the two photos, are they the same jet? I’m seeing 3796 and 3791 on the rear fuselage. The second photo, the BuNo isn’t clear enough to read, unfortunately. They are different, I meant to include only as general examples. Lothar, AlbertD and Brett M 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck540z3 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Checking several photos, it appears that it is a timing thing, with early 70's having no paint on the chute door, while later examples, which are more numerable, have it painted. My apologies to ziggyfoos for the misdirection. Examples: 1971- No paint 1974- No paint 1977- painted, although who knows if this is actually correct 1989- painted Conclusion: If you want early 70's accuracy, go with the metallic look like ziggyfoos said. Cheers, Chuck Dragon, Brett M, Derek B and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertD Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 15 minutes ago, chuck540z3 said: Checking several photos, it appears that it is a timing thing, with early 70's having no paint on the chute door, while later examples, which are more numerable, have it painted. My apologies to ziggyfoos for the misdirection. Examples: 1971- No paint 1974- No paint 1977- painted, although who knows if this is actually correct 1989- painted Conclusion: If you want early 70's accuracy, go with the metallic look like ziggyfoos said. Cheers, Chuck Where do you guys find all these great photos? I must have looked at 1000 photos and didn’t see anything like these. Is there search method? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuck540z3 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 5 hours ago, AlbertD said: Where do you guys find all these great photos? I must have looked at 1000 photos and didn’t see anything like these. Is there search method? Google is your friend, especially when you hit the "Images" tab. Here is the search for your subject where you will find some chutes painted occasionally, but they are much later than the early 70's. VFMA-232 F-4 Phantom And here is a search of all versions of F-4 Phantoms, where you will find that most chute doors are painted, but most are also more recent pics like the ones I posted above. F-4 Phantom Having poked around for these pics, it comes to my mind that the chute door may be aluminum while the other panels forward of it are titanium, so over time they started to paint it for corrosion protection? It's also a bit different color than the other panels, making the determination of light grey paint vs bare metal tough to decide, especially with old grainy photographs. You also find some cool stuff like this VFMA-232 bird that had a bad day, but it appears the air crew survived by ejecting. First guy to say, "That will just buff out!", will lose a small and very important kit part to the carpet monster. Cheers, Chuck vvwse4, AlbertD, Michael931080 and 3 others 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertD Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, chuck540z3 said: First guy to say, "That will just buff out!", will lose a small and very important kit part to the carpet monster. Cheers, Chuck OK, I won't say it but that is another great weathering reference. Thanks Chuck. Edited September 19, 2020 by AlbertD stusbke, Michael931080 and chuck540z3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stusbke Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 2 hours ago, AlbertD said: OK, I won't say it but that is another great weathering reference. Thanks Chuck. well do remember when it looks like that it crashed LOL Cheers Frederick Jacobs AlbertD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael931080 Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Oh come on now! That will definitely.............................................. Never Mind! Brett M 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 Only thing i could find in ref to the above pic of the accident a/c: 6 Oct 1972 WT-15 sustained a damaged stabilator from cable slap following an M21 arrestment. Arrestment was made due to a utility hydraulic failure. (VMFA-232 incident 5-731) Jari AlbertD and chuck540z3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertD Posted September 19, 2020 Author Share Posted September 19, 2020 19 minutes ago, Finn said: Only thing i could find in ref to the above pic of the accident a/c: 6 Oct 1972 WT-15 sustained a damaged stabilator from cable slap following an M21 arrestment. Arrestment was made due to a utility hydraulic failure. (VMFA-232 incident 5-731) Jari Thanks for that bit of history. Would they consider that plane repairable? It does not look like any real structural damage aside from the tail fin being ripped off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggyfoos Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 26 minutes ago, Finn said: Only thing i could find in ref to the above pic of the accident a/c: 6 Oct 1972 WT-15 sustained a damaged stabilator from cable slap following an M21 arrestment. Arrestment was made due to a utility hydraulic failure. (VMFA-232 incident 5-731) That's not the same aircraft. 5814 in that pic is from 1969 in their earlier Vietnam deployment (can also be seen it is their earlier scheme, black nose, fuselage insignia, and would've had large slanted WT on tail) 5814 ended up crashing in 1970 (stricken). AlbertD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn Posted September 19, 2020 Share Posted September 19, 2020 58 minutes ago, ziggyfoos said: That's not the same aircraft. 5814 in that pic is from 1969 in their earlier Vietnam deployment (can also be seen it is their earlier scheme, black nose, fuselage insignia, and would've had large slanted WT on tail) 5814 ended up crashing in 1970 (stricken). I also found this: F-4J-35-MC Phantom II/Bu. 155814 VMFA-232 as WT-15. 1970: VF-121. 9/14/1970: Crashed near San Diego, CA So was it with 232 or 121 when it crashed? Jari AlbertD and chuck540z3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ziggyfoos Posted September 20, 2020 Share Posted September 20, 2020 10 hours ago, Finn said: I also found this: F-4J-35-MC Phantom II/Bu. 155814 VMFA-232 as WT-15. 1970: VF-121. 9/14/1970: Crashed near San Diego, CA So was it with 232 or 121 when it crashed? Jari I'd imagine VF-121 info from that Forgotten Jets entry is correct if the date/location is accurate too, it is also the same on Joe Baugher data as well. VMFA-232 was in Japan (with training to Philippines and Okinawa) from 1969-72 between their two F-4 deployments to SEA. sorry Albert for the diversions AlbertD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbertD Posted September 20, 2020 Author Share Posted September 20, 2020 10 hours ago, ziggyfoos said: I'd imagine VF-121 info from that Forgotten Jets entry is correct if the date/location is accurate too, it is also the same on Joe Baugher data as well. VMFA-232 was in Japan (with training to Philippines and Okinawa) from 1969-72 between their two F-4 deployments to SEA. sorry Albert for the diversions Don't worry about the slight thread drift. It adds context to the build. It's all about learning for me and I hope other get something from it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now