Jump to content

Interesting Spitfires


Recommended Posts

Stumbled upon this picture when I was looking for references for my Mosquito's Merlin engines.    

6c81708ba9a56e900a478d77b7fe46e6.jpg

 

Assuming it's not colorized, it's a pretty nice picture.   I'm curious about the solid green over blue paint scheme.   Never seen that before;   Was it common?   Also, anyone know what mark Spitfire these are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mark P said:

Upper right of photo...colorized....

 

Mark Proulx

Nice catch.  That being said, any speculation on the paint scheme or mark of those two Spits?   Was there a chance that some spits had a solid upper color?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add some interesting details. ER718 in the background was a MkVb built Oct 1942, sailed on the Empire Day to Gibralter, arrived 9 Nov '42. Despatched to NW Africa Feb '43, transferred to ME April '45, SOC 28-8-46. Going from that it should have had the Desert scheme ie Dark Earth, Middle Stone and Azure Blue unders. Seems it had a longer life than a lot of other Spits.

TRF

Edited by fastterry
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, fastterry said:

Just to add some interesting details. ER718 in the background was a MkVb built Oct 1942, sailed on the Empire Day to Gibralter, arrived 9 Nov '42. Despatched to NW Africa Feb '43, transferred to ME April '45, SOC 28-8-46. Going from that it should have had the Desert scheme ie Dark Earth, Middle Stone and Azure Blue unders. Seems it had a longer life than a lot of other Spits.

TRF

 

So they applied the 2nd camo color after national markings and serials were painted on?   Interesting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2020 at 10:47 PM, CATCplSlade said:

 

Yes, but you can make some best guesses based on the accuracy of the colors applied to other objects in the photo.

 

This could start a very long thread. Which colours do you consider "accurate"? The roundel blue and red are definitely wrong. I really don't think you can infer anything from any other colour in this photo. I would argue that the flesh tones are too healthy for this period of the war (poor diet, probably working extended shifts with little natural light, etc.). The colouring is nicely done, but forget it as a reference of any kind, in terms of colour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, LSP_Ron said:

Using a colorized photo as reference..... holds no water.

Is the lady really in red? or is it blue,? or rose, or light blue?

 

 

eyYFHEr.jpg

 

Great photo, real color???? we know it's not 

Yum!  Ahh, those were the days.  It's a pity girls can't look like that today.  Never mind the color.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2020 at 7:59 AM, John1 said:

Nice catch.  That being said, any speculation on the paint scheme or mark of those two Spits?   Was there a chance that some spits had a solid upper color?

 

For a Spitfire with one upper surface colour, off the top of my head, you could go for an RAAF Mk VIII - some were finished in Foliage Green upper surfaces, usually over RAAF Sky Blue.

 

Another option is some of the Mk V's sent to Malta, apparently repainted with a blue over all upper surfaces. Some controversy here though around what Blue was used.

 

There are also the High Altitude Scheme Spitfires with PRU Blue upper surfaces. Perhaps easiest of all are the overall PRU Blue Spitfires but this will involve conversion to a PRU Type.

 

Edited by Pete Roberts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...