Rick Griewski Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Griewski Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 The thing will look nice next to my 1/35 Luftwaffe helicopter. A family group. Rick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bellis Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 hour ago, Juggernut said: How was the gyroscopic precession handled in such an aircraft? Seems like it'd be almost uncontrollable given the amount of mass spinning at that arm and the resistance to changes in direction of the plane of rotation. Would it require helicopter type inputs (90 degree control input offset) or aircraft type control surface inputs; both; neither? The blades were articulated to alter their AoA and consequently the thrust angle of the ramjets to regulate speed and/or lift required (depending on the mode of flight). Normal elevons and rudders on the cruciform tail were to provide directional control. Deeper technical aspects are detailed in a few books written by David Myhra, Roger Ford and others. Source of skepticism or not, the Triebflugel (translates as "Thrust Wing") did get as far as wind tunnel testing during WWII. It along with Heinkel's two VTOL projects (Wespe & Lerche) directly resulted in post-war US VTOL experiments: Lockheed's XFV 'Salmon' and Convair's XFY 'Pogo'. The reality is that the aerodynamics of flying and controlling it had already been worked out on paper. However, as with the two US developments flown post-war, the two ultimately insurmountable issues likely would have been 1) Prodigious zoom-climb when transitioning from level flight to vertical attitude for landing, and 2) Lack of rearward visibility for orientation while landing. HTH, D Out2gtcha and CATCplSlade 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan_G Posted May 8, 2019 Author Share Posted May 8, 2019 Eagle Driver, LSP_Kevin, EvilCarrot and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob MDC Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1/35 makes sence for this type of aircraft, since V1 and V2 plus all supporting vehicles, cranes and railway stuff all 1/35 a diorama with the fuselage cranned of a railway wagon !! Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firefly7 Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Thank you Miniart, 2 for me as soon as available in the us. Keep these types coming, and we'll keep buying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Bellis Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 14 hours ago, Bob MDC said: 1/35 makes sence for this type of aircraft... Only if the kit is thought of as just another doll accessory. D Jack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 I have to agree with D on this, as putting my personal dislike for that scale aside, and already having a 1/32nd version in process, I can say I dont think this should be in 1/35th at all, as I consider it an aircraft, and not a helicopter. AAOF, Id probably buy one of these if it was in 32nd. Since its in *that* scale Ill pass and keep my 1/32nd version. Jack and D Bellis 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutik Posted May 9, 2019 Share Posted May 9, 2019 Hooo-Woooow! Yippee! Great move, MiniArt! Folks, if you are not happy with the 1/35th scale there is an easy fix: Brush one ore two more coats of paint onto your kit - and you have got your 1/32 scale replica Duck and cover - dutik spacewolf, Jack, CATCplSlade and 1 other 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericg Posted May 11, 2019 Share Posted May 11, 2019 I simply don’t understand why this is being released in 1/35th scale and not 1/32. D Bellis 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericg Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 8 hours ago, ScanmanDan said: I think you have to consider that this kit will likely be on the shelf with other 1/35 scale Miniart kits and thus be picked up by an eager trackhead for a spin, if you pardon the pun. I don't think this is an odd decision for Miniart at all. I reckon the number of eager propeller heads that would buy this kit if it were 1/32 would greatly exceed the number of eager trackheads keen to enter bolster their aviation stash in 1/35 scale mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trak-Tor Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 miniart-models.com Out2gtcha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Technically there already is a 1/32nd Triebflugel: https://www.scalemates.com/kits/antares-models-mm-006-focke-wulf-triebflugel--1125139 Im in process on mine, and its as one would expect with a short run resin kit, but its mostly all there, but no canon or super detailed interior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcap1960 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Oh please, get a life. It wasn’t too long in the dim and distant past that 1/32 nearly went the way of the dinosaur. No chance of that occurring in 1/35. Does it really matter if they produce it it 1/35 rather than 1/32? Just enjoy the fact that something unusual is produced. If you don’t like it, don’t buy it. Wackyracer, Pete Fleischmann, Jack and 2 others 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adameliclem Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Given how many kits of figures, vehicles and field equipment exist in 1/35th, this makes a lot os sense. Great potential for dioramas, and I hope to see some soon. CATCplSlade 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now