PhilB Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 (edited) I suppose it depends on which photos you look at. A quick search of Gurgle showed plenty of wartime photos. The intakes look pretty much the same as the kit ones to me. But again and it's the usual "but" until someone has the production kits in hand and compare them to accurate plans then questions about accuracy are still up in the air somewhat. Posted under the "Fair use" criteria: Edited October 12, 2018 by PhilB Iain and Jan_G 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerhard Posted October 12, 2018 Author Share Posted October 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, rafju said: Hi On pre order here: https://www.hobbyeasy.com/en/data/7vflo3dlqll6lhxk6dq3.html ZAR 5200. Ouch!!!! +45% Vat and duties + shipping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cees Broere Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 IIRC there are three intake variants as used on the Lanc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafju Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Gerhard said: ZAR 5200. Ouch!!!! +45% Vat and duties + shipping. With the "option": "best price guarantee" (detail through the add) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanKB Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that Wingnut Wings, after 8 years of research and on the back of pretty much unblemished work on their other 75 odd kits, will get the kit spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npb748r Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 4 hours ago, JT68 said: Jeez, you're better than I am if you can tell that, from that photo, it's so grainy and washed out. I think that was the point I was trying to make - you made it better than me and more succinctly. We are looking at really low quality photos from 70 or 80 years ago, because of that you can interpret what you are seeing, it's mainly subjective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
npb748r Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 4 hours ago, PhilB said: I suppose it depends on which photos you look at. A quick search of Gurgle showed plenty of wartime photos. The intakes look pretty much the same as the kit ones to me. But again and it's the usual "but" until someone has the production kits in hand and compare them to accurate plans then questions about accuracy are still up in the air somewhat. Posted under the "Fair use" criteria: anyone know why the front turret guns are missing on both these pictures ?? Assume this is unusual ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff T Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, npb748r said: I think that was the point I was trying to make - you made it better than me and more succinctly. We are looking at really low quality photos from 70 or 80 years ago, because of that you can interpret what you are seeing, it's mainly subjective. Sorry about that, I misinterpreted what you wrote. npb748r 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Williams Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 27 minutes ago, npb748r said: anyone know why the front turret guns are missing on both these pictures ?? Assume this is unusual ? Most times, guns are removed between missions for servicing. scvrobeson, npb748r, Iain and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1to1scale Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 I took a really close look at the HK sprues for this kit, I have to say I am VERY disapointed. there are tons of ejector pin marks in visible places, the bomb bay pins are impossible to sand. A lot of interior structures have soft edges. I would expect this from a $100 kit, not a $350+ kit. I dont think I would buy this kit at all, especially knowing there is a better one a year away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesHatch Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 48 minutes ago, 1to1scale said: I took a really close look at the HK sprues for this kit, I have to say I am VERY disapointed. there are tons of ejector pin marks in visible places, the bomb bay pins are impossible to sand. A lot of interior structures have soft edges. I would expect this from a $100 kit, not a $350+ kit. I dont think I would buy this kit at all, especially knowing there is a better one a year away. Which internal structures have soft edges? I'm building it now and didn't notice any. Perhaps it was my photography? Also, as for ejector pin marks, please remember that this is a TEST SHOT and not final quality. I can't say whether any pin marks will be seen on the final, but these things have tended to either lessen or disappear when HK do the finals. Southern Bandit, Jan_G, scvrobeson and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CATCplSlade Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 37 minutes ago, JamesHatch said: Which internal structures have soft edges? I'm building it now and didn't notice any. Perhaps it was my photography? Also, as for ejector pin marks, please remember that this is a TEST SHOT and not final quality. I can't say whether any pin marks will be seen on the final, but these things have tended to either lessen or disappear when HK do the finals. Don't worry about it. I personally ignore the comments of people who have not actually seen a final retail release of an item. Especially when they make absolutist statements based on a test shot. scvrobeson, PhilB, Jan_G and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 Guys, we can all understand seeing a new kit and analyzing it off the bat, but lets please reserve any definitives till the production kit is released. Critiquing a kit, good OR bad is a good thing as long as it is discussed in an adult respectful manor. Lets please keep the respectful part in mind as we go forward with this new kit. Once the production version is released I think everyone will get a much more definitive feeling of what the kit we will actually be getting will be like. Iain, LSP_K2, Jan_G and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozart Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 (edited) The whole "discussion" about the presence or absence of stressed skin, so called oil canning on the HK/WnW's kit and the real thing is getting a little tedious, especially since few of us have seen the HK offering and probably none of us the WnW one. Below is a wartime picture of G-George of 460 squadron on her retirement from operational life (90 ops) taken just before she flew half away round the world to Australia. Following are a few close ups of George in the AWM, original and not restored is my understanding, that I took in 2010. Lighting conditions in the hall are not great for photography but I can't see a lot of stressed skin on such a venerable old lady that is going to be too evident in a 1/32 model! Edited October 12, 2018 by mozart alaninaustria, npb748r, Southern Bandit and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanKB Posted October 12, 2018 Share Posted October 12, 2018 I don't find the stressed skin discussion "tedious". If WNW pull it off, I could see that it may lead to all sorts of models being reissued with the stressed skin look. It may not work, or it may not suit everybody's tastes, but in terms of 1/32 modelling it's one of the most exciting developments I've seen for a while, and I'm fascinated to see how it turns out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now