Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Back from vacation ....playing catch-up with work and finally working in some bench time.

 

Tail with some paint on there ............ Tamiya Sky Grey base ...... then Tamiya Dark Sea Gray in the panel lines .....followed by MRP Light Gull Grey ..... and MRP Insignia White for the rudder.

CG4OX5.jpg

 

and .......the marking are going on !!!!  just one side of the tail for now ......other side after this is fully dry.

The wetness at the bottom of the tail is before I Q-Tipped the excess up.

To help the decals slide easier I use some good old spit ......LOL !!!!!

Nothing like a little DNA investment.

HcPVNv.jpg

 

Posted

Gear doors .....exterior and interior ..... the still need a wash and another clear coat.

 

Using the AOA Decals stencils and markings though there are a few Red Pill decals in there.

I found the Red Pill decals to be super thin ..... to the point that they annoyed me.  :-)

 

UeXLsG.jpg


s42Wcy.jpg

 

Posted

OK ......put a second coat on, leaving it a little ratty looking, after all, it is a Vietnam war machine !!!

and then since I had the leading edges painted and the flaps, I had to test fit them ......just press-fitted for the pics.

I'm happy with it so far !!!

 

Uv4X7a.jpg


VGb0wU.jpg


Wxspr1.jpg


BDwlqE.jpg


NSUukD.jpg

 

Posted (edited)

I agree it’s looking dang good, looking forward to more of your build, and then also your final assessment and opinion of this monster of a kit from Redpill. 🫡

Edited by DugyB
Posted (edited)

Good catch on eliminating the RHAW antenna on the tail fin, and you have a great build going.

 

Heads up that the fairing under the radome of the Red Pill kit has the longer, fiberglass RHAW antenna cap, as well; which would be a matched-set with the "acorn" on the aft edge of the tail fin: if an airframe didn't have the antenna on the tail, then it likely didn't have it under the nose, either.

 

Most of the photos I can find of -323 aircraft from this era don't have great resolution, but it looks like the majority of them still had the AAA-4 IR sensor mounted in the nose fairing, which is shorter and rounder than the APR-25 RHAW antenna housing. And, if an airframe didn't have the IR sensor, it would have had the aluminum "dummy" cap, which was about 5" shorter than the APR-25 forward antenna radome. 

 

You can see the different proportions and shapes of these fairings in Tommy Thomason's blog, here: https://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2023/06/early-mcdonnell-f-4b-phantom.html

 

The APR-25 RHAW system wasn't really configured on Navy F-4Bs until late 1966/early 1967; and the Marines flying CAS from South Vietnam probably didn't get it until even later than that. 
 

Edited by cmayer
Posted
On 8/22/2026 at 7:37 PM, cmayer said:

Good catch on eliminating the RHAW antenna on the tail fin, and you have a great build going.

 

Heads up that the fairing under the radome of the Red Pill kit has the longer, fiberglass RHAW antenna cap, as well; which would be a matched-set with the "acorn" on the aft edge of the tail fin: if an airframe didn't have the antenna on the tail, then it likely didn't have it under the nose, either.

 

Most of the photos I can find of -323 aircraft from this era don't have great resolution, but it looks like the majority of them still had the AAA-4 IR sensor mounted in the nose fairing, which is shorter and rounder than the APR-25 RHAW antenna housing. And, if an airframe didn't have the IR sensor, it would have had the aluminum "dummy" cap, which was about 5" shorter than the APR-25 forward antenna radome. 

 

You can see the different proportions and shapes of these fairings in Tommy Thomason's blog, here: https://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2023/06/early-mcdonnell-f-4b-phantom.html

 

The APR-25 RHAW system wasn't really configured on Navy F-4Bs until late 1966/early 1967; and the Marines flying CAS from South Vietnam probably didn't get it until even later than that. 
 

Great article !!! Thanks for sharing. I will definitely reference it on my next F-4B .....earlier one ......1965 with the earlier seats.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...