Jump to content

James Rademaker

LSP_Members
  • Posts

    574
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from DugyB in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    Terrific job on this build. I’m really looking forward to the completed Jug. I really like the way you changed the cockpit interior color from interior green (WWII) to USAF grey. Nice touch.
    Jim
  2. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from LSP_K2 in Bf109 G14 and K4 main differences   
    A few differences I can think of off the top. One was the extra main undercarriage gear door. Another is the G-10 could have the smaller tires and the K4 had the larger tires and the larger wheel bulges on the wings. Lastly the instrument panel and the starboard cockpit panel are different from the G6 and G10 cockpits.  I’m sure that the 109 experts will add much more detail than I provided.
    Jim
     
  3. Thanks
    James Rademaker got a reaction from JayW in 1/18 Scale P-51B 3D Print Build   
    Fantastic job!! The level of detail is most impressive. I can not wait to see the finished Mustang. Looks so realistic.
    Regards,
    Jim
  4. Thanks
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Vitor Costa in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  5. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from coogrfan in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  6. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Martinnfb in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  7. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Gary Needham in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  8. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from intheway in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  9. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from CRAZY IVAN5 in Trumpeter's BF-109, your opinions please?   
    I recently built the Trumpy 109G-10. Parts are well engineered and crisp. I liked the kit from the cockpit firewall aft. From the firewall forward to me there is way too much that can go wrong. The propellor shaft is in the engine which is connected to the machine guns. When I test fitted the fuselage and the propeller spinner is was about 2mm down and to the right. I had to remove the propeller shaft and use brass rod re drilled into the engine. Then it fit correctly. This could be due to my skills or the fidgety parts. I’m a big believer in the Hasegawa 109’s . I never display an engine so Hasegawa fits me perfectly.
    Regards,
    Jim
  10. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from DugyB in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    I made a few of the Hasegawa P-47’s. The engine work was always the last assembly I did, procrastination at its best. 
    Jim
  11. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from DugyB in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    Can’t wait to see this bird with some SEA paint on! Terrific work.
    Jim
     
  12. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Martinnfb in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    Can’t wait to see this bird with some SEA paint on! Terrific work.
    Jim
     
  13. Thanks
    James Rademaker got a reaction from fozzy in Super detailed cutaway of a JU87B "Stuka"   
    Sir, your level of detail is off the charts. This is a museum quality model. Congratulations well done!,
    Jim
  14. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Azgaron in P-47D Thunderbolt - Hasegawa 1/32   
    Well done. This is a subject I built a few years ago. I really like the look of Eagleston’s bird. Looking forward to your thread.
    Jim
  15. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from DugyB in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    Really like this thread. BTW,is she going to be painted in the normal SEA tri camouflage colors?
    Jim
  16. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from DugyB in USAF F-47 THUNDERBOLT VIETNAM   
    Ever knew that T Bolts were used in Nam. Looking forward to seeing your progress.
    Jim
  17. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Out2gtcha in When to Panel Line   
    Thanks HTH. That’s what I’ve been doing.
    Jim
  18. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Out2gtcha in When to Panel Line   
    Guys,
      I have been using Tamiya black panel line to highlight my builds. My question to you all is when? Do you finish painting the subject , gloss, panel line, re-gloss and THEN apply the decals or do you gloss,apply the decals and then panel line. I’m thinking that the panel line could creep under some decals and ruin or lift them. 
    Thanks,
    Jim
     
  19. Thanks
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Greif8 in Ever file 13 a kit or kits in progress?   
    Well done Ernest.
    Jim
  20. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from coogrfan in Ever file 13 a kit or kits in progress?   
    If you really don’t want or like the kits you are thinking of trashing , why not give them away to a local hobby store so someone may have a chance to complete them. Or try selling them in our traders board for spare parts?
    Jim
  21. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from hworth18 in Ever file 13 a kit or kits in progress?   
    If you really don’t want or like the kits you are thinking of trashing , why not give them away to a local hobby store so someone may have a chance to complete them. Or try selling them in our traders board for spare parts?
    Jim
  22. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from Rampenfest in Tamiya Spray Paints (Aviation Series)   
    George,
    I am an avid modeler who does not own an airbrush. I have been using the Tamiya spray AS and TS paints for about five years. Recently, I’ve been building WWII German 1/32 BF and FW fighters. I highly recommend the Tamiya  paints. The coverage is good and they dry very fast. I wish they had some of the late WWII  colors used on BF109K and FW190 D-9’s. 
     
    Regards,
    Jim
  23. Thanks
    James Rademaker got a reaction from patricksparks in 1:18 Scale B-17G Flying Fortress Forward Fuselage   
    My friend, you have some “MAD SKILLS”. About 20,000 feet above my skills. 
    Fantastic work,
    Jim
  24. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from BiggTim in Hello all!   
    Tim,
     looking forward to seeing your product list in the future. 
    Jim
  25. Like
    James Rademaker got a reaction from rafju in Tamiya Spray Paints (Aviation Series)   
    George,
    I am an avid modeler who does not own an airbrush. I have been using the Tamiya spray AS and TS paints for about five years. Recently, I’ve been building WWII German 1/32 BF and FW fighters. I highly recommend the Tamiya  paints. The coverage is good and they dry very fast. I wish they had some of the late WWII  colors used on BF109K and FW190 D-9’s. 
     
    Regards,
    Jim
×
×
  • Create New...