harvy5

I can't agree with you. Everyone knows the Trumpeter plans are very bad. Google will find many photos under the Su-25 ANCA. Camo shades are good, but the bottom surfaces have bad shades. Decals are ABSOLUTELY wrong. ANCA is goodbut the emblem city of Ostrava is smaller, and they have bad colors. The insignia and number are too small,and shark mouth too big. The armament is for the Su-25 ABSOLUTELY unrealistic.Only the BM version had big air intakes on the nozzle covers. But this is a completely different aircraft. Look at the construction of my Su-25th, I described the repairs of the models. and https://modelweb.eu/2011/12/16/walk-around-na-su-25k-6019-anca/ I put photos on ANCA on the internet in 2011. With a warning that this NoseArt was only a few hours and the equipment was 2x drop tank and 2xSPPU canon pod. Just look at Google and you don't have a problem.

Nice build but the final version do not like me. Why does everyone build 90% of Soviet planes as What-if? Camo and all markings are wrong. I also wrote it here at LSP. I also don't understand why everyone puts an air intake of cooling of electric generators on the nozzle. It was only the Su-25UB and BM, and it is very different from the Su-25 with different tail fin.And armament .... Nobody looks at a photo of a real plane?

No, this is another I made together with ANCA.. ANCA I gave my very good friend, a former Su-25 pilot. Now commander of new pilots training for the F-16 in Texas. So maybe I will fly in the F-16. I am still working on K 1007, UBK 3237 Slovak AF and TM white 21 Russia AF Shock cones are from Su-22 HB 1/48. Su -22UM-3K I must have. Our astronaut Ivan Bela took me to on back seat M2.

Next Frogfoot! I love this plane. Remove air intakes from the nozzles. These are only on the BM version with the R-195 engines and has another rudder.

I hope this week I finally finish my "*****". There's not much work there. And a few details. Rivets are HGW 1/48.

After a long time, I'm back. Anca is done. Now I'm working on Bull and 1007..The details are the same as on 6019, and I'll be on the last 1007. I made new ailerons and edited the tail and flaps. Armament will be 2xKh-29L and 2xPTB-800.For Kh-29, I modified the AKU-58E adapters and BD3-25 AKU racks.

We can talk in Telford

A few of my findings regarding the B17 Bit'O'Lace. I built but only 1/48 http://modelforum.cz/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=36342&hilit=harvy5+bit+o+lace

Last Miloslav models are perfect .... I watch it on modelforum.cz

It is difficult. This model UBK as I started to do, but now is the Su-25T. In the moment, I had serious health problems.During the weekend but starts again on the model of Su-25

Good job. I would be interested cockpit in this upgraded version with ICAO responder. It's SO-69 or some other type.THX

Excellent camo!

It's as Zero77 writes. Several years I have the Su-25 work every day as crew chief, and then again as contractor during repairs. For modeler is the most important of all camo is inaccurate. Additionally or colors reversed (green-sand ), ignorance of Soviet regulations of camouflage aircraft. Decals are at least proportionally for Czechoslovakia completely wrong and in bad colors. The instructions are again a mixture of both models Su-25 and Su-25UB and they differed significantly. And now shape. Trumpeter mixed in one model All versions Su-25, Su-25K, BM, UB, UBK T. So it looks as the F-16A, B, C, D, E, F all series in one. Most are on the ailerons. Used only in the plane until 1986, later it had only 12 Czechoslovakia, and the right not trimer. And there's more. For me, all the Soviet aircraft from Trumpeter are a big disappointment.

Nice work, if only the model was not so bad.

It was an even bigger mistake. Neither of camo Trumpeter is not good.

:goodjob: looks very good!!! You got too much green. I sent you a photo of the Red 59, Linden Hill have bad colors in the instructions.

Always I like when someone makes my love, Frogfoot. The cockpit is gorgeous, but two mistakes you got. Air intakes for engine were of anodized aluminum, so he was up in yellow shades. Before overhaul. The second error as tanks.They have de-stabilizers on front and no stabilizers, and in the back have bad shape.Plus details...

90% of the work is done. With flaps I spent about 2 hours and I have already had the strength to do better. However, I have at least good deflection.

After a long time I found some time for Anca. I finished chassis, and I can go into the finals.

Hope you're feeling better!!! Ballistic computer is only for no-controlled ammo.Missiles are controlled by laser beam and corrected METKA button on the control stick.

Vjuga pod for Kh-58

Marc I gotta correct you. First gen Frogfoots using CH-29L on pylons 5 and 7 but had to be replaced by a rack BD3-25 for BD3-25AKU, it was normal and use it against the heavily fortified bunkers.Some Su-25 could have Kh-58, but then had to be on the rack 6, container BA-58 Vjuga.

Thank you guys. Another big problem, absolutely bad canopy. Bad shape, framed ... The shape is something between single seat and two-seat version. Single seat version ... and two seat version Trumpeter.... ... and after a little repair

This is illustrative example of my stupidity, lock brake parachute. a few small things Finally, any on site with a parachute. Why I was doing everything it will not be seen?

I continue repairs bad shape. Space for ladders. Vertical stabilizer is too high, has a bad angle, the same thing fairings. Rear fuselage with a chaff-flare dispensers to be reshaped. when I made a container for brake parachute so I stupid idiot started doing other details