red Dog

This is true model art !! Always been in awe with WWI model results

Nice and inspiring Nic.

Another great model from you Koralik, looking superb

Great Result Nick

I have that one as well Alain, but when I see the catapult starting so close to the JBD, I don't trust any of it's dimension So far 36x14 feet seems pretty good and that would translate to343x133mm in 1/32 and 228x89mm in 1/48 Since the 3 main JBD are made of 6 sections, 36 ft makes sense and induce 6 feet per section. JBD4 is 4 sections, thus 24 feet wide I think I'll stick to that for now

Thanks for the input gents, As I said in the first post, I work on the USS Nimitz, with Tomcat on boards. After that I won't be too pedantic about exact measurements. It's just that the conflicting data I have for now are not 10 cm off for rather 6 feet off. So I'm trying to get an order of size closer to 30 feet or 36 feet. if It's 30.22 or 35.48 I don't really mind It's the 6 feet I mind Here are some interesting bits I found: So 14x36 feet and they raise to 50° The distance from the catapult for the 4 JBD is also very interesting although I suspect there is a mismatch between distance for catapult 1 and 2 (or they are numbered the other way) because on all pictures we can see that JBD2 is placed further aft from the catapult2 station0 than theJBD1/Catapult1) The temperature resistance and cycle to allow the aircraft to roll over them once they are down are insane. Using sea water to cool them is a maintenance nightmare for sure. Here' s the raised height of 10.7 feet at 50° and the 9inches recess will be usable. These dims also seems to imply to allow backward compatibility that the ones fielded now are not greater than that. Supposedly I may accept the fact that even without proof, all active carriers have somehow been updated with later Mod0 Mk7 JBD. Again, I won't be too pedantic, I'm looking at something that doesn't strike the eyes in proportion.

lol, yes sorry JBD, Jet Blast Deflector

I am looking for more information about JDB sizes. I'm currently doing a diorama for a tomcat and I have different data for the JDB sizes. It seems catapult 1 and 2 are identical in size although placed at a different distance from the catapult shuttle. Catapult 3 and 4 are different but I'm looking for their dimensions as well. Current size I used are 30.5 feet long but I feel they are too narrow. I found data for Mk7s to be 36 feet long. Which looks much better. Not sure USS nimitz has the Mk7. So i'm fishing for some more information should there is someone here with more data and willing to share. The overall plan is to design different carrier deck section I can place one aside the others to enlarge the scene. I am currently starting with 2 sections for catapult 1&2 But to get all details right I am designing the full deck: This will also allow me to cut specific sections later on for other projects: Here's where I am now (obviously it's far from being finished and accurate but I am looking for all comments for correction, the idea is to try to get this as accurate as possible before using for building carrier deck sections: Thanks for any data you may have

what? no aftermarket?

Nice project going on again Mistral I'll be following along your progress. That dual seat mirage is tempting ...

Looks like they are coming https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/ED632168?result-token=LfRVB

Cory, I think we have all been through that point. When you look for stuff original you probably venture into converting a model that wasn't done before and you'll eventually end up without decals. Same for the larger scale where aftermarkets are sparse because not commercially viable. 1/18 might be even worse. Been there done that, got the tee shirt - as many others here on this board Here's a short article on explaining the principles of how I address these issues on my own models: https://reddogsmodels.wordpress.com/2021/03/09/custom-decals-masks/ Beside my own projects I get requests from fellow modelers and I actually enjoy the process of finding solutions together for these custom projects. Quite often the answers lie indeed in combo masks and decals. I'm currently working on a 1/7 (it's huge) RC Spitfire I have to give a new scheme... (damn material of these which don't support masking ) and they use stickers from the box which is ugly and short lived. I enjoy these challenges, the research that goes with it, and the enthusiasm of fellow modelers seeing a custom project becoming a reality. We as modelers like to find our own solutions, I do the same. Sometimes you need help with very specific items. If you get to that point don't hesitate to get in touch. I'll be happy to help.

Looking good Nick

I might be able to help. Been considering to launch my own lines of combo decal/mask sheets and I have been doing custom decals and masks for quite a while. So if you have a good idea of what you need, I might be able to print and/or cut it.

Super in flight Peter. It's really one of a kind. Love it

Same Fred.

thanks for posting that. I felt I missed the first not having facebook, I'll surely not miss that second run. Your notice is much appreciated. Glad they consider doing an extra run for us.

Striking scheme. Good choice in the end, great model !!

I stand corrected, thanks On initial though I was convinced the aft canopy had it too, but on second thoughts if it were it would be a real pain in case for instance nobody is in the back seat Since mechanic and pneumatic system are involved it actually makes sense to have only one spider in the front pit. Thanks for pointing that out Pete, and I stand corrected with my tunnel vision of front seat only. That leads me to the next question then if I may: Can you then confirm that there is actually no way to raise or lower the canopy from the back seat (short of jettison)? There's no canopy motor switch back there either? Correct? Thanks

That may be huge decal sheet in that scale. I'm wondering why the decal choice over masks? If it were me I'd probably want to paint the markings rather than use decals. If someone is looking to get one of of the JSI F-14 tomcat, I have a friend who's selling his from Belgium (sorry for the shameless plug)

Here's how it works in the aircraft, granted it's a sim but it's easier to demonstrate the feature there than in the real aircraft It's actually not a cage for the throttle, but has 3 features: 1. it acts as a canopy motor switch guard 2. it closes a pressure switch which starts cockpit pressurisation 3. it prevents the throttle to be moved into AB range. It's indeed present in both front and aft cockpit

nope, you got a few fingertips to paint Amazing details Norbert. Wow

Absolutely no need for apologies It's not like we have only one kit in the stash. Glad it's still planned i'll wait all the time you need Thank you for your quick reaction

Is the F6F-3 conversion still planned? I've been delaying my build waiting for this one. I don't mind delaying more - just wondering if it is worth waiting for it? Thanks

looking great Fanes