IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Me 109 G-4 tweak list
thierry laurent
post Sep 16 2005, 12:23 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1589
Joined: 21-August 03
From: Belgium
Member No.: 78



Another one to review:

Messerschmitt Bf109G-4 Trop TWEAKS LIST


TYPE: Messerschmitt Bf109-G4/R2/R6

SCALE: 1/32

COMPANY: Hasegawa

KIT NUMBER: 08135 for the original release, 08148 for the Regia Aeronautica re-release

This kit has also been released by Revell Germany as kit 04721 and by Revell-Monogram Pro-Modeller as kit 5981

MOLD CREATION DATE:

2001 for G-6 sprues
2002 for specific G-4 sprues (N: Upper nose cowl, machine guns and belly blanking plate parts - L: tropical air filter parts)

TWEAKS LIST VERSION 1.0 (publication date: September 2005)

Compiled by Thierry Laurent


The following list is intended to help modelers in improving scale accuracy of an airplane model replica. In no way is it intended to support or be offensive towards a scale model company.
As such, it is only the result of a progressive process and is in no way intended to be absolute or even comprehensive. Hence, it is intended to focus on commonly admitted discrepancies and will probably not cover some errors. It is up to the modeler to decide whether correcting the listed issues is worth the time and money he will have to invest in the quest for accuracy process.
No aftermarket correction or detail set is mentioned in this document as the availability of such items may be very variable. Hence, refer to other LSP sections to find relevant information. Moreover, aftermarket sets do not necessarily correct all listed issues. Please refer accordingly to relevant documentation.



1. NOTICEABLE FUSELAGE ISSUES (from front to rear)

• Spinner is noticeably misshaped as Hasegawa probably copied a wrongly shaped new one on a restored airframe. The spinner base plate diameter should be 23mm long. Correct spinner tapered profile as well as the three propeller blade openings that should taper (cropped teardrop shape). Add a slight indentation where the front portion of the spinner is attached to the rear portion. Enlarge blast tube and drill a 1,5mm diameter hole. Add raised data plates on spinner and backing plates. A simpler option: replace the spinner with a correct aftermarket one.
• Profile of supplied A11 propeller blades supplied is acceptable but not totally correct for a VDM9-12087A propeller. There is no hub detail on the blade root. Modifying the blades is a pain. Replacing them with aftermarket is a solution as far as some are available. Fortunately, this is not as noticeable as the spinner shape discrepancy.
• Above the exhaust stacks, Me 109G-4s have two small cowl scoops. Many airframes had them in line with one another but kit has these depicted as being offset, the rear being higher than the fore. Hollow them and according to the airframe you want to built, possibly move the front one (possibly using aftermarket parts).
• Thin or replace exhausts cover plates because they are way too thick (parts A14&15).
• Hollow-out engine exhausts or replace them with aftermarket ones.
• There is no panel line between the top cowl and the cowl sides (part L3 and fuselage): fill and sand smooth the seam.
• Some details are missing on the supercharger intake: weld seams and eight screw heads around the forward lip. By the way, bolt heads will not be visible if the filter parts are used. The air filter support legs (part N1) are too thick and should be sanded down to a more correct thickness. Note that parts should show no seam with the fuselage as part of the intake has been molded with the fuselage. Some Trop Gustavs used another type of air filter with very small scoops rather than mesh. Check your references.
• Hollow-out MG 17 nose barrel parts (L1&2).
• Forward lower cowl is a little bit too angular near the first panel line behind the oil tank housing. Curve should be gentler than on the kit area. Sand it to smooth the angle.
• Underbelly oil cooler housing is misshaped (part G4). Correcting this asks for a time-consuming job but the discrepancy is quite noticeable. Part should have a deeper cross section, wider and tapered sides and sharper front edges. Its flap door linkage is missing. Note that FO 870 type had a rod in front of intake mesh whereas FO 827 that was externally identical had none as the kit part. Correct the part or replace it with aftermarket parts.
• A second seam line for the cowling should be added to depict the missing rubber seal around the rear of the cowling.
• Check if the plane you want to depict had an air scoop under the windscreen. If this was the case, open the aperture with the edge of a new scalpel blade.
• Replace DF FuG 16ZY loop antenna with the correct flat cross-section.
• Add and drill the fuel fill ventilation outlet hole under the fuselage section 3. This should protrude from the belly.
• Add FuG25 IFF antenna under the same section 3.
• Correct trim tabs elevators as they were always offset on the ground.
• Add antenna between the mast (M9 part) behind the rear portion of the canopy and the tail mast (do not forget to add insulators). Take care as the mast part to be glued behind the canopy has a tendency to be slanted a little bit too far forward.
• The elliptical inspection hatch on the port side of the tail should be filled (between the tail horizontal surface and the jack hole).
• Do not forget to leave a seam on the top and bottom and rear fuselage sections.

2. NOTICEABLE WING/WEAPONS ISSUES


• Hollow-out MG 151 barrels and add their canvas covers. MG151/20 gondolas are too short. Cut them in the middle and add 3mm. The easier way to do this is to cut the center section of gondolas from another kit and add it where the cut was made. Add internal extension to the ejection port.

• Lower wing parts have details for gun and rockets whereas they should only have either the former or the latter (on the outboard panel just after the edge of wheel bay). The elliptical hatch and four small holes only appear on fall 1944 (except on earlier planes already equipped with W. Gr42 Spr. 21cm rockets) whereas the rounded hatch was only present on Kanonenboot planes equipped with MG151/20 gun gondolas. Leave the correct details according to the airframe you choose.

• There is a panel line on the top of the wing (outboard of the wing root) that does not continue
to the bottom half of the wing.

• There is a riveted strip at the wing root that runs along the underside of the aircraft but does not continue to the top side. It should continue back to the vertical line on the wing root fairing.

• Kit has steps in the leading edges of the wing into which the slats retract. On real airframe, these steps are no thicker than the wing's aluminum covering. There are two solutions to fix this. The most accurate but also most complicated option asks for carefully cutting a thin piece of sheet styrene to fit into the slat well, with the sheet stock's thickness chosen to leave a very small step; cementing the filling piece into the slat well, being careful to keep the new step heigh constant; and then filing down the leading edge of the filling piece where it disappears under the slat. Second option is simpler: since the real aircraft's step is so small, an adequate and much easier fix would be simply to fill the step with putty and then file it to shape. Add one big bolt head (e.g. Grandt line) under the end of each arm of the opened leading edge slat.

• Thin, replace or rebuild radiator flaps and add the missing activating levers. If you want to use them as such, fill the ejector pin holes in them.

• The wing radiators are well done with inserts providing the radiator faces for both the front and rear. However, Front face part is not correctly located: they are ten or eleven millimeters far too backwards. Move accordingly the parts to the front. Add the flap actuating arm.

• If you do not depict an early G-4 with narrow wheels and drill holes in upper wing parts intended to locate the bean-shaped parts on the wings, do not forget filling them afterwards.

• Drill the four elliptical holes in the landing gear leg well. Add missing oleo actuator behind them.

• Drop tank has too many weld seams. Fill the forward segment line and add the tank hanging strap. Possibly replace with aftermarket parts.

• Thin ETC rack part and drill recessed holes as the actual part is made of an embossed iron sheet. Correct drop tank anti-sway brace legs and add fuel connectors. Possibly replace the rack with aftermarket parts.
• G-4s had no Morane antenna on the underwing. Glue the R3 base part, fill the mast hole and sand smooth the area.



3. NOTICEABLE COCKPIT ISSUES


• Kit does not give any specific G-4 detail. Fortunately, there were not very obvious differences between G-4 and G-6 cockpits.
• The kit instructions give two options regarding front instrument part: either paint engraved details or sand them off and then apply the decal on a flattened surface. However, another option will give better result if you use kit part. Cut the nice decal in parts before applying it on engraved instruments.
• Add cockpit UV lights on the windscreen frame.
• Add seat belts and their attachment points.
• Add oxygen hose, missing wires and details on the cockpit sides and on the right side of the floor (throttle, oxygen system, etc.).
• Remove section of tube on the upper edge of right cockpit side and replace it by clear tube to depict clear section intended to control fuel flow from external tank to internal ones.
• Kit pedals are correctly shaped but far too thick. Sand them and drill holes or replace them with photoetched ones and add their leather straps.
• Detail REVI C12/D gunsight, add glasses and replace its mount to position it correctly.
• Detail area behind the upper belts fixture points (e.g. tubes of the rear canopy structure, personal luggage compartment door details, etc).


4. NOTICEABLE CANOPY ISSUES


• Add the two missing handholds on the top of the internal side of the windscreen part.

• Add purple/red-brown paint on the small engraved disk in the front armored glass of windscreen. This was the silicate dehumidifier capsule.

• Add canopy release lever, clear knobs as well as retainer spring lock (with spring-shaped copper wire)

• Detail internal side of canopy parts: add plastic strips with white glue to simulate sliding glass panes. This is particularly necessary for moving central canopy part.

• Smooth edges of central and rear canopy parts (T1&2)

• If you use it, decrease thickness of B15 pilot head armor.



5. NOTICEABLE LANDING GEAR ISSUES


• Add flexible brake hose on each main landing gear leg (between the wheel and the leg) and possibly replace existing molded section.

• Main landing gear doors are too thick. Sand or rebuilt them. Moreover, kit part actually depicts two different parts on the actual airframe. Upper section needs adding the mounting and guide rod.

• Dress up the side of the main landing gear wells (holes, canvas dust cover, radiator hydraulic line, etc.).

• The Bf 109G-4 had an open tail wheel well. It was not faired over as in the next marks (G-5, G-6 and so on). However, Hasegawa supplies the same rear fuselage parts as in the G-6 kit. Hence, cutting and adding stiffeners using strip styrene around the edges is required. Move the tail wheel strut to correct position. Note that if the tail wheel strut cover style was different to the G-6, it was not always fitted. Early G-4s had a smaller, retractable tail wheel as Friedrich airframes. Kit depicts the fixed, large style tail wheel fitted on later G-4s. Last but not least, if you use the kit parts, separate the wheel from its yoke or engrave the seam to simulate different parts or replace it with aftermarket parts. Check reference pictures of the airframe you want to depict and correct accordingly the tail wheel area.
• Hasegawa and Pro-Modeller releases of the kit have the correct six spokes main landing gear wheel rims with 660x160 ribbed tires whereas the German edition is lacking such resin additional parts. Unfortunately, the plain hub type appeared on very late G-4s and anyways chosen schemes do not refer to airframes with such wheel hubs. Early G-4s did not have the bean-shaped wing bumps as they were using the same narrow spoked wheels as the G-2 and F airframes. Aftermarket companies released such wheels.

6. OTHER NOTICEABLE ISSUES & MISCELLANEOUS REMARKS


• General kit dimensions are nearly perfect and overall fit is excellent.

• All panel lines and prominent rivets are recessed (more particularly on the belly). They are raised on specific locations such as wing roots. However, there are no rivets where they were flushed (on the upper wings and the rear fuselage). Engine area has very well done door fasteners. Fabric surfaces are smooth with tape strips topped with delicate stitching detail.
• Kit has different parts showed in the instructions as “not for use” ones. Take care as they are not optional parts. For instance, do not use the Galland armor parts A26, R5 and R6 as G-4s used only the standard steel head armour (B15 & 16). Note that curved top extension (part B15) was not fitted on all canopies. Again, check references to see which style is accurate for a chosen airframe.
• A strong "H" shaped wing spar part ensures perfect dihedral and a good fit at the wing root.
• The flaps and the slats parts may be positioned (even if on the ground actual flaps were generally retracted).

• Middle canopy part is not intended to be glued closed.

• Possibly separate underwing forward radiator flaps.

• Possibly separate oil cooler intake rear flap.

• Possibly remove the two umbrella mounts on the port fuselage side cockpit area if you do not build a tropical airframe.

• Do not forget filling GM1 and MW50 filler hatches as requested in the instruction sheet.

• To ease assembly of the separate tail parts with fuselage sides, do not comply with Hasegawa directions and glue each tail side with each fuselage side.

• Possibly remove and reposition control surfaces.

• Note that even if this is far from being very noticeable, angle of main wheels is not totally correct. To possibly solve this, shorten a little bit the wheel axle and set the angle to a more correct position.

• Pilot figure is seated a little bit too low. If you use it, bring it up to a higher position (with a plasticard spacer)

• Up to now, kit has already been released three times with different markings options:

- 08135: JG 52 (Erich Hartmann) and 8/JG53

- 08148: Regia Aeronautica, 365 Squadriglia, 150 Gruppo Autonomo

- 04721: Revell-Monogram ProModeller 5981: JG 53: four options

- 05981: Revell Germany 04721: ditto


The accuracy of the decals will not be assessed here as many interpretations are possible and there are a lot of aftermarket options.

_________________________________________________________________________________


The list of references about the Messerschmitt 109 is an endless one. The list author focused on sources that are more oriented towards plane components rather than plane colors. Many excellent books have been printed about the later topic but this is out of the limited scope of such a list. As such, sources dedicated to Luftwaffe paints and camo, 109s colors or 109s used by Germany allies have not be used here.

Accordingly, the following sources were used to build this list:

Modelling essentials:

• Hladik, Sumichrast & Andal, Messerschmitt Bf-109F, G2 a G4, HT Model Special N°903, no publishing date.
• Nohara & Shiwaku, Messerschmitt Bf 109 G, Aero Detail series, N°5; Dai-Nippon Kaiga Co., Ltd., 1992.
• Peczkowski, Messerschmitt Bf-109G, Mushroom model magazine special Vol.1, N° 6011, 2000.
• Prien & Rodeike, Messerschmitt Bf 109 F, G, & K Series, Schiffer, 1993.
• Verlinden & Letterman, Messerschmitt Bf 109 G-2, Lock On Aircraft Photo File series N° 28; Verlinden Publications, 1997.
• ---, Messerschmitt Bf 109 G/K Augsburg Eagle, Model Art Special Issue series N°290, Model Art, 1987.
• ---, Messerchmitt Bf-109G in Detail, Militaria in Detail, Wydawnictwo Militaria, 2000.
Other used references:
• Beaman, Messerschmitt Bf 109 in Action Part 2, Aircraft in Action series, N° 57, Squadron Signal Publications, 1983.
• Donald, Messerschmitt Bf 109 – Supermarine Spitfire – Supermarine Seafire, Air Combat Legends Vol.1, Airtime Publishing, 2005.
• Hitchcock, Messerschmitt 'O-Nine' Gallery, Monogram Aviation Publications, 1973.
• Hitchcock, Gustav: Messerschmitt 109G Part 1, Monogram Close-Up series N°6, Monogram Aviation Publications, 1976.
• Mermet, Les Messerschmitt Bf 109 G-1 a K-4 - Moteurs et Amιnagements , Self-published, no date.
• Merrick, German Aircraft Interiors 1935-1945: Vol. 1, German Aircraft Interiors series, No. 1, Monogram Aviation Publications, 1996.
• Michulec, Messerschmitt Me 109 pt. 2, Aircraft Monograph series, N°17; AJ Press, 2002.
• Michulec, Messerschmitt Me 109 pt. 3, Aircraft Monograph series, N°18; AJ Press, 2002.
• ---, Messerschmitt Bf 109 / Focke Wulf Fw 190, Maru Mechanic series N° 50, Maru, 1985.
• ---, Messerschmitt Bf109, Military Aircraft Special issue, Delta Publishing, 2001.

• some magazines articles

• some web pages (more particularly LSP, Hyperscale & 109 Lair)







Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Black sword
post Dec 29 2006, 03:31 AM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 29-December 06
Member No.: 2301



How many G-4 with pods were built? when did they enter frontline units? Some went to JG 27 I have heard. Anyone know how many?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wumm
post Dec 30 2006, 01:11 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 21-July 04
From: Bris-nee-land, Australia
Member No.: 516



As ever Thierry, merci.

Essential information for the Luftwaffe Nutters on LSP.

Steve.



--------------------
Wumm's LSP W.I.P. Stickies:
1/32 PCM Macchi C.205 - 10th Anniversary Group Build
Hasegawa Bf 109 G6/R6 - Resurected Member Build

When you're movin' in the positive, your destination is the brightest star...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LSP_Matt
post Dec 31 2006, 12:47 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 5072
Joined: 3-May 05
From: Red Hill
Member No.: 901



Thierry, great work as usual.

I though we myth busted the position of the cowl scoops? Haseagawa got it right...its the many pictures of the 109G's whilst 'tail sitting' that creates the optical illusion that they are meant to be parallel.

Cheers Matty


--------------------
Scheme of manoeuvre: I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. Only way to be sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wumm
post Dec 31 2006, 02:42 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 21-July 04
From: Bris-nee-land, Australia
Member No.: 516



Hey Matty,

Well, Hasegawa got it right... and also wrong. Some photos show the scoops as offset, but other airframes definitely have them parallel along the horizontal axis as well. Hasegawa, a little maligned at the time because of it, had to make a choice and went with the offset. It was that or mould the scoops separately I guess.

As always, check the reference of the a/c you're modelling (if there's a nose shot, that is). There are probably those around more hard core than I who will have the scoop information for separate block numbers, as well as the specifics about the gun pods for the Black Sword!

Steve.


--------------------
Wumm's LSP W.I.P. Stickies:
1/32 PCM Macchi C.205 - 10th Anniversary Group Build
Hasegawa Bf 109 G6/R6 - Resurected Member Build

When you're movin' in the positive, your destination is the brightest star...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlesMetz
post Dec 31 2006, 02:47 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 2535
Joined: 19-August 03
From: Chicagoland, USA
Member No.: 63



QUOTE(LSP_Matt @ Dec 31 2006, 12:47 AM) [snapback]98788[/snapback]
I though we myth busted the position of the cowl scoops? Haseagawa got it right...its the many pictures of the 109G's whilst 'tail sitting' that creates the optical illusion that they are meant to be parallel.

I don't recall any such consensus, and in any case I'd never agree, because far too many photos in my library taken from a variety of angles show that the nose scoops were more or less aligned on most '109 Gs and Ks. I say "more or less" here because the alignment clearly varied, and "most" because a small proportion of photos clearly do show scoops as misaligned as those on the Hasegawa kits. Frankly, I don't think tail-sitting has anything to do with this issue.

'Scuse me a minute, Matty ... Hey, Lynn ... we need you over here. IPB Image

laugh.gif

Charles Metz


--------------------
"Back off, man; I'm a scientist."
-- Dr. Peter Venkman (Bill Murray) in Ghostbusters
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LSP_Matt
post Dec 31 2006, 03:47 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 5072
Joined: 3-May 05
From: Red Hill
Member No.: 901



Here's the link.

Thanks for the info guys. Maybe Lynn might be able to shed addtional light. Radu's line in the repeated picture shows the impact of tail sitting nicely.

Cheers Matty

Mythbuster 109 thread


--------------------
Scheme of manoeuvre: I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. Only way to be sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CharlesMetz
post Dec 31 2006, 04:30 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 2535
Joined: 19-August 03
From: Chicagoland, USA
Member No.: 63



QUOTE(LSP_Matt @ Dec 31 2006, 03:47 AM) [snapback]98813[/snapback]
Here's the link.
--snip--
Matty,

Thanks. I now remember the thread and recall that, in my opinion, it fails to demonstrate that "Hasegawa got it right" for most '109s, because only the first photo (of our old friend Black 6) shows scoops that are staggered as much as those on the Hasegawa kit, whereas the scoops in the other photos are staggered appreciably less. On the other hand, I accept the basic point that most or all '109 G and K scoops were staggered at least a little (which is why I wrote "more or less aligned" in my previous post), and I'm very grateful for your pointer to the earlier thread, which I've now bookmarked.

Perhaps I'm a bit sensitive about this issue because, as an inherently lazy person, I tried very hard to convince myself that the Hasegawa scoops were right for most '109s — yet in the end was forced by the evidence to conclude that I had to change them.

Charles Metz


--------------------
"Back off, man; I'm a scientist."
-- Dr. Peter Venkman (Bill Murray) in Ghostbusters
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LSP_Matt
post Dec 31 2006, 11:44 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 5072
Joined: 3-May 05
From: Red Hill
Member No.: 901



Yeah no dramas at all Charles.

Its an easy fix any way...I just used some Vinylsiloxane impression material from work ( only 99.99% accurate) and then used some GC corp Pattern Resin to duplicate new ones ( Acrylic powder/liquid)...done...perfecto in less than 5 minutes... cool.gif

Be nice to hear Lynns view on it given his research in the 109 area.

Cheers Matty


--------------------
Scheme of manoeuvre: I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. Only way to be sure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
thierry laurent
post Jan 2 2007, 08:55 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1589
Joined: 21-August 03
From: Belgium
Member No.: 78



Happy new year guys!

I laughed a little bit when I discovered that nobody seemingly realized this post was 16 months old...

BTW, this had at least another benefit: I realized that I never sent the Spitfire list to Chris...! I just hope that I'll have a little bit of time to produce other ones in 2007!

BTW to reply to the initial question, gun pods were not put on planes on production lines. Such add-on kits (named rustsatze) were added in field workshops. This is why this version is named G-4/R6! Accordingly, it is impossible to give a number as such because they were not used on a permanent basis.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
thierry laurent
post Jan 2 2007, 09:06 AM
Post #11


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1589
Joined: 21-August 03
From: Belgium
Member No.: 78



This may give you an answer (thanks to Charles for the link in antoehr thread!):

http://www.dragonmodelsusa.com/dmlusa/prodd.asp?pid=HAS08170
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
one0nine
post Jan 2 2007, 11:21 PM
Post #12


LSP Junkie
****

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 15-December 06
From: Norfolk, VA
Member No.: 2235



Woof, that's a long list... blink.gif I'll look it over to see if there's anything Thierry missed, but I seriously doubt it. I will add this to the cowl scoop issue: yes, there were some A/C with staggered scoops, but most had them in a line. Don't forget you had who knows how many subcontractors making parts for later model Gustavs, and all it took was the replacement of a damaged cowling panel to get things slightly out of line. Luftwaffe service personnel did have more important things to do than make sure the scoops were properly aligned, y'know! biggrin.gif

Thierry, thanks for investing so much time and effort into these lists.

Cheers,

Lynn
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevegallacci
post Jan 3 2007, 12:06 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
******

Group: LSP_Members
Posts: 1076
Joined: 6-June 05
Member No.: 948



The Great Scoop Issue has, in part. a fairly mundain aspect regarding model engineering. the rear scoop is just about where it ought to be, relative to the rest of that cowl panel. However, the cowl panel is tooled short, because the exhaust deflector is out of scale thickness below it. So to accomodate the exhaust and exhaust deflector, the cowl was fudged a bit, putting the scoop more out of alingment.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th September 2010 - 02:03 AM