Steve Eagle Posted August 5, 2017 Author Share Posted August 5, 2017 I am the same one that started this post, and would like to clarify something. Jim,does this conversion work with the Revell kit or is it strictly aimed at Hasegawa and Tamiya? I have just pulled the Revell kit back out to work on it again. As Elgar stated the Grey Matter is definitely not a good match up in height. Hopefully we can get this figured out. Maybe the nose and the lower cowling pan can be jockeyed around to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_Kevin Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 I am the same one that started this post [...] Steve, would you like me to merge your two accounts? This way you get to keep your post count and history, and we get one less redundant member account. Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Eagle Posted August 5, 2017 Author Share Posted August 5, 2017 That would be great Kevin. Just email me with the details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_Kevin Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 That would be great Kevin. Just email me with the details. No need. I'll just merge your old account with your new one. Just keeping logging in with your new account; there's no need for you to do anything differently. Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justjim1 Posted August 6, 2017 Share Posted August 6, 2017 HI guys I have reworked my griffin conversions after reading the feedback and hope that they are more accurate and would like any more feedback . Jim LSP_Kevin and Christoffer Lindelav 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justjim1 Posted August 8, 2017 Share Posted August 8, 2017 Hi Steve I built the conversion around the revell kit the mkIX is the better host a bit less work to do better canopy , as the MKII front fuselage is the wrong shape /different shape from the MKIX. regards JIm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elger Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 (edited) HI guys I have reworked my griffin conversions after reading the feedback and hope that they are more accurate and would like any more feedback . Jim Jim was kind enough to send me his new Mk XII nose (Mk XII Mk II ) and this morning I compared it to the first one, the Grey Matter nose, the Revell Mk II kit, and the Tamiya IX kit. Took some photos, here are the results: Overall view. The nose is much longer than the first one (=good) and the line at the bottom for the lower panel is straight (=good). The fasteners are quite pronounced but could easily be sanded down if desired. Old nose left, new nose right. Also notice that the overhang of the bulges has disappeared. Great improvement! New nose left, old nose right. The new nose is much taller, which should make it considerably easier to fit to the Revell kits. The new nose doesn't have the step at the back vertical panel that the old one has. I don't know if the Spitfire XII had the step in the rear panel like the Merlin engined variants had. Compared to the Grey Matter nose: Grey matter is flatter on top - Jim's nose is rounder. The other noticeable difference is the bulge in the middle - Jim's is longer which I think is more accurate. The little intake on the back of the cowl is taller on Jim's version, and is hollow as opposed to Grey Matter. I only have the Revell Mk II kit to compare it to, and without cutting off the nose it's a bit tricky to see how well it would bit, but I think it should work just fine: To satisfy my own curiosity I also tried to fit it to the Tamiya IX kit - it actually doesn't look bad and could be made to work relatively easily: Comparison to Tamiya nose panels: Final picture: All in all I would say that at this point in time Jim's conversion is the best way to get a Spitfire XII in 32nd scale. Edited August 11, 2017 by Elger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Eagle Posted August 11, 2017 Author Share Posted August 11, 2017 Thanks for the review. Looks like I will be placing an order this next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indian70 Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 Jim's conversion looks really good to me.Imagine a Tamiya Spit with this conversion.......A thing of dreams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunwinglow Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Just received my replacement nose, lovely casting, thanks very much, and plus 1 for some excellent customer support! I need another Revell Spitfire now!! Tim Cees Broere 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nmayhew Posted August 21, 2017 Share Posted August 21, 2017 True, but if you wanted a nice Vb you could attach the Hobbyboss wings to a Tamiya fuselage. Nose is a bit tricky but the Hobbyboss nose parts could probably be made to fit... surely now you use a Revell IIa and the Czech Model Vb conversion parts (just a few bits)? and voila you have an early Vb if you want a late one, buy a Revell IXc and kit bash (with some nose hacking) given the two kits can be had for £40 total at the moment, it's not as crazy as it sounds, and still much cheaper than involving the gorgeous tamiya kits... Cees Broere 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justjim1 Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Hi Elgar thank you for review the revised cowl I hope that you like the changes that I made , I know that the Dzuz ? fasteners are a more pronounced than they really should be but adding these so small without losing them was almost impossible so like you have advised whilst building my own models I have rubbed them down so that they are just above the surface level ( much easier on the resin copy than on the master .best regards, Jim . ps I will post my builds , both Seafire MKXV and MKXVII , I am bilding them together side by side so will take a little longer . pps having never built a navy seafire I would like some advice on the best colour of paints to use and makers of the paints . ppps I prefer to use acryilics . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now