Madmax Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 (edited) Hi Robert, Good work on the IP - it looks unmistakably Swiss. Your reference photo's are excellent, and will surely be useful to many in modifying what (as you noticed) is essentially a Mirage IIIE cockpit into a "S". Watching with interest, Sean Edited March 21, 2018 by Madmax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortress Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 hello Robert, FIRST CLASS!!! on your IP created. one of my project is the M3S or/and M3RS the configuration will be the last layouts. - i'll include que ALR instrument on the right side - i'll create the sunshield soon to all jean-paul Marcel111 and Harold 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortress Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 i give you some more information: the specific leg gear the nose Marcel111 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunnus Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 Hi Robert! I'm not a jet builder but I really enjoy your approach to the build. The photo documentation, followed up by the work itself is very enlightening AND fun to watch! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatterOne Posted March 28, 2018 Author Share Posted March 28, 2018 This is exactly what I hoped for, when I started this thread, that it starts to live and becomes active. Thank you JPP. Of course, the main driver should be to build this plane as advertised. I'm aware, that JPP has a profound knowledge and will correct me if I'm misleading you. The picture Jean-Pierre provided reflects a Mirage IIIS IP from the mid 80's until phase out. Interestingly, it's the airframe of the first prototype J-2301. This aircraft retired October 28th, 1999 and resides now in the aircraft museum in Payerne. JPP also points out an unique modification on the nose gear for the Mirage IIIS /RS required for the aircraft to enter the mountain caverns. In normal level, the fin is too high to pass under the bomb blast deflectors built into the entrance of the cavern. The ‘Surgonflage' haut function that extends the nose gear shock absorber, allowed the nose to raise and therefor to lower the tail. I enclose a picture of a Mirage IIIRS just passing the outer door. This gives you an idea of the dimensions. best, Robert Marcel111, F`s are my favs, LSP_Kevin and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortress Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 hi Robert, and all of us, one study and useful info... soon jean-paul Kais and Marcel111 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatterOne Posted April 18, 2018 Author Share Posted April 18, 2018 Allmost 3 weeks without an update from my side = 0 points: sorry Now – I have not been lazy – but modelling time was limited. However – we had an IPMS Switzerland Meeting in Thun the past weekend and this was simply a great show. For this show I wanted something new and designed a decal sheet along these lines: Of course – this is not for everybody's taste – but it is fun. J-2329 with Pegasus in November 1997 at the end of her airframe flying hours. To feel well, one has to touch some plastic – even when achieving little. My current focus is on the rear of the cockpit – the area behind the ejection seat. Italeri provides I nice detailed part – put since I plan to built a very early Mirage IIIS, there are too many details that had to be removed and some wiring to be replaced. However – the more I compare the plastic with pictures the more I get disturbed. The kit part makes an over engineered impression – sort of like a house with one floor to many. Still – I do not want to make a new part – but for my next Mirage I probably will – depending how this will work out once the cockpit is complete. I realise that I make very little progress here – but that is fine with me. Last night – I found a nice box in front of my front door – the Kitty Hawk F-5E has arrived. Do not worry – I will not start another one – but I ordered this kit to get the vertical Stabiliser. I need this part because I intend to scale up my Peace Alps Part Two decal sheet to 1/32 scale – and the decals must fit! Saying this – I will work now on two projects, but the Mirage will continue! Best for now Robert Harold, Out2gtcha, HerculesPA_2 and 5 others 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marine104 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Lovely work Robert, this will be a great thread to watch! I plan to build both a later Mirage IIIS and IIIRS with the excellent Matterhorn decals. A lot of work and modification for sure but your efforts should result in a rare and beautiful model. I dread building the specific IIIS nose, have you any thoughts to how you will do this? My plan is to use the drawings on the 1/32 Matterhorn sheets as my main guide. Best Regards, David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSP_K2 Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Glad to have you here, David. Out2gtcha 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Out2gtcha Posted April 24, 2018 Share Posted April 24, 2018 Cool scheme! I like the dragon a lot. Looking forward to more progress! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marine104 Posted April 25, 2018 Share Posted April 25, 2018 Glad to have you here, David. Hi Kevin, thank you and hello, glad to be here! David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatterOne Posted April 26, 2018 Author Share Posted April 26, 2018 Hi David Thank you for the flowers. Obviously, I cannot comment on the ‘excellency' of the Matterhorn Circle Decals, but they are for sure quality. First – somebody has to build the model and apply the decals – that will set the mark! So far, I'm selling dreams… That's one of the reason for this build – to line up the modifications required and hopefully some practical solutions for them. The lack of the required parts is certainly one of the reasons why we do not see any build up Swiss Mirages. This must be changed… You are right, Italeri provides only parts for the Mirage IIIRS in an early configuration. The Mirage IIIS requires a nose extension of about 12mm in 1/32 scale. The modern way to get the longer nose cone is certainly a CAD drawing and access to a 3D Printer. On the other hand, I'm thinking about a 12mm extension plug-in between the fuselage and the original Italeri nose cone. This idea includes filling the nose with epoxy and when cured sanding the assembly to new sleeker shape. Of course – this sounds very basic, but eventually I will get there once the cockpit is finished and the fuselage closed. Best regards, Robert Harold, Marine104 and Marcel111 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark M Posted April 26, 2018 Share Posted April 26, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marine104 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Hi David Thank you for the flowers. Obviously, I cannot comment on the ‘excellency' of the Matterhorn Circle Decals, but they are for sure quality. First – somebody has to build the model and apply the decals – that will set the mark! So far, I'm selling dreams… That's one of the reason for this build – to line up the modifications required and hopefully some practical solutions for them. The lack of the required parts is certainly one of the reasons why we do not see any build up Swiss Mirages. This must be changed… You are right, Italeri provides only parts for the Mirage IIIRS in an early configuration. The Mirage IIIS requires a nose extension of about 12mm in 1/32 scale. The modern way to get the longer nose cone is certainly a CAD drawing and access to a 3D Printer. On the other hand, I'm thinking about a 12mm extension plug-in between the fuselage and the original Italeri nose cone. This idea includes filling the nose with epoxy and when cured sanding the assembly to new sleeker shape. Of course – this sounds very basic, but eventually I will get there once the cockpit is finished and the fuselage closed. Best regards, Robert Hi Robert, Having used some of the Matterhorn decals before, they are very good imho! I like your idea for the new nose. I was thinking something similar as I have no access to a 3D printer. I have looked at possible spare part pieces that could be used/adapted and sanded to shape, I have not checked against drawings but possibly RAF Tornado Hindenburger tanks additionally fitted to the Italeri nose may be of use, I do not know yet either fully as my build is sometime off construction. Because I plan a late IIIRS and IIIS, items such as canards, nose gear modifications, flare dispenses among many others requiring duplication, I am thinking of making masters in plastic and then casting in resin. I am not sure at this stage but personal thoughts at least for the future. Anyways, keep up the fantastic work, I am enjoying this thread a lot Cheers, David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MatterOne Posted May 13, 2018 Author Share Posted May 13, 2018 I got a bid sidetracked by Davids question how I plan to do the radome. For a while I have put the cockpit aside and present you today one sugestion, how a new rose for the Mirage IIIS could be created. As previously stated, I followed the modern route of CAD design and 3D printing. With some help the drawing for the new nose was actually completed in very little time - compared to the printout. I must admit that I do not possess a CAD programme - therefore the file was created online with some freeware. This has the advantage, that the new Mirage 3s radome hangs somewhere in 'the cloud' and everybody who is interested, can access the file for free. The next step was the printing. Lucky as I am, I have a friend who owns a desktop 3D printer. Of course, I'm aware the these surfaces will require substantial sanding and a nice coat of surfacer, but I have a shape, that looks the part. Now.... more work lies ahead. Somehow I have to prove, that the new nose fits the model and second, that it looks correct compared to the references. best, Robert blackbetty, MikeMaben, Whitey and 8 others 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now