Jump to content

Old Revell Me 109G


imatt88

Recommended Posts

You say the 109G was inaccurate, how about the 109F.  Now that's an inaccurate kit.  Basically, it was their G. kit without the bumps on the cowl for the machine guns.

 

That's exactly what it was. The F was first tho.

In 1967 it was the first (here in the U.S. anyway)

available 'round nose' 109 in ANY scale other

than the 1/72 Airfix kit. I was thrilled to get one.

Nowadays if you get one cheap, it's a fine wam-bam

kit to have fun with. Not worth spending much time

or any aftermarket on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I thought the Revell 109G was the Bee's Knees when I picked one up aged 12. Got one in the stash to build, but purely as an exercise in nostalgia.

 

There is also an article in a modelling book which throw's everthing and the kitchen sink at the kit, and the end product is impressive, but probably not worth the effort considering there are better 109Gs out there. Can't remember the title. I'll post it up, but it could be Brian's build.

 

Personally, I would build it out of the box for a bit of nostalgic fun!

 

Best regards;

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have built this kit at least ten times back in the day. I also recall tethering the 109 to the back of my Schwinn stingray and trying to keep it in the air behind my bike. Perhaps this is why I built several, eh? Ha. I think in the end the 1/32 Spit flew better and had a tighter turn radius! Ha. Kidding. Built it and have fun.

 

Troy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, how accurate was the old Matchbox 1/32 Bf-109E-3 kit?

Years ago I built at least one of them and enjoyed the build.

There is one listed on eBay currently starting at $9.95.  eBay number  item number: 352121283450

​In fact, on eBay there is now a whole messer of those schmitts for sale, including a Hasegawa kit.

No, none of those are mine. I announce when my stuff is selling on eBay.

Stephen

Edited by ssculptor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen;

 

I've always been led to believe that the Matchbox Emil, shapewise at least, was very accurate. Of course, there's always the usual Matchbox hallmarks to contend with like chunky detail and heavy panel lines, but the shape is good. A lot better than the Hasegawa Emil.

 

Best regards;
Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen;

 

I've always been led to believe that the Matchbox Emil, shapewise at least, was very accurate. Of course, there's always the usual Matchbox hallmarks to contend with like chunky detail and heavy panel lines, but the shape is good. A lot better than the Hasegawa Emil.

 

Best regards;

Steve

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks,

 

I've been reading Brian's article and it is very informative, to say the least.

 

Brian does excellent work.

 

Is there any way to make this thread more accessible?

 

I would like to use it for future reference.

 

Cheers, Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any way to make this thread more accessible?

 

Not really, but I've just linked it to the Kit Database entry for this kit:

 

 

http://www.largescaleplanes.com/kitdb/details.php?kit=944

 

If you scroll down to the "Build Threads" sub-category, you'll see Brian's build listed there. There really aren't too many others, unfortunately, but if I find any, I'll add them.

 

Kev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...