Tony T

I believe that was your intention. You're a Muggist Max! (compute dyslexia and a word break). The 18th April is the anniversary of the Doolittle Raid (82 years), Lucrezia Borgia’s birthday (544) -- and also that of “Mr Vark” F-111 Wizzo James E Rotramel (74), who has done a fantastic amount to get accurate Aardvark modelling resources achieved; just a shame he isn’t a 1:32 modeller. So, my wish list also includes a 1:32 General Dynamics F-111F. As for the Sunderland, I’d like to model my biological paternal grand-father’s last flight in Sunderland Mk.III W4026 DQ-M from 228 Sqn. A tribute, not a morbid wish. As for the Halifax, for me it has to be a late mark with Hercules engines, ‘rectangular’ fins and plexiglass nose, or a Halton with the luggage bay. Maybe 19 yr-old Navigator Patrick Burgess’s machine shot down by British coastal ack-ack after a bombing raid. No, sadly, he said not everyone got out. A splendid man who later became VP Rolls-Royce America, knew Lockheed Skunk Works Ben Rich and got to fly a NASA F-106B. A guiding hand for me at times. My adoptive Dad and he were both Navs on No. 511 Sqn Britannias at RAF Lyneham in the early 1960s. I’d be happy with the latter done in 1:72 by Airfix. Per Ardua Ad Astra, or permezz tal-avversità tal-istilel as they might say in Malta, Tony

100% on the mark. My budget doesn't allow for paying for an image hosting site, assuming I am still competent to take the pictures. It's quite condenscending assuming that non image-posters do not build. Tony

The Aerocraft is the correct length but assumes chopping up and shutting the fuselage, as per rafju's link to the Cocardes conversion article, which involves reworking the glare shield etc too. How much would the ResKit gear need to be reworked? If the kit windshield is prone to cracking I'd be on the look out for a direct resin spare — i.e. a copy of the incorrect kit windshield as-is. The one thing that will always totally ruin a build is irrepairable clear parts. That information has dulled my enthusiasm a little as it may "force" the modification. Tony

The box says it "includes an air bomb". When I was younger that meant a gas bottle for the soda siphon. Nowadays I'm guessing self-administered nitrous oxide. Tony

The wish-lists are always a repeat set of subjects from most of us, including your Anson and my Su-15 included, so it's easy to tune it out like white noise or tinnitus. What I was hoping for was constructive speculation as to what Halifax and Sunderland marks these might be and whether a minimum change kit could offer two versions? Or a civil Sandringham or Halton? No one apparently has any more rumour data so it's best to maybe freeze the thread until it's picked-up (or not) by an official announcement. Cheers Tony .

My hands aren't steady enough and I don't have an image host to link them to here. An experience shared by many I suspect. I'm going to attempt some digital snaps later this year to send to the mods for posting. But what's wrong with building and collecting unbuilt kits too? Surely most of us have an as-yet unbuilt "collection" in our heads? The information seemed quite reliable (not from a mischief maker), and the prospect of a big Halifax is completely credible from a firm that's already produced multiple subvariants of two four-engined heavy bombers. We shall see. The Sunderland seems a little more remote due to its bulk, but my thoughts are that H K Models are designing these in 1:32 but may be aiming to tweak the CAD to produce a 1:48 kit, or both. I'd get both in either scale but would have to drop 20% of the stash to justify two 1:32 offerings sold in suitcases. Tony

Remember also that F-16 insignia were smaller, like PACAF stuff, so 1:48 F-4 TAC and 388th TFW insignia would be anout right on a 1:32 F-16A, which opens up your search. Tony

Which is what a Mosquito is on one engine, but heavier. Tony

That sounds like a deathwish in real life. You'd end up rolling one wingtip into the ground due to torque. 1st. If I got back to flight sim I'd love a realistic F-14A Tomcat programme and fly every difficult scenario, from a single motor compressor stall on approach to a flat stall spin, night operations etc. 2nd would be Phantom F-4K daytime launches and traps on the teeny Ark Royal, with rocketing and bombing target barges or shooting down Jindiviks for weapons practice. 3rd would be F-22 at night, delivering low yield Mk/B.61 silver bullets against troublesome targets South of the Caspian Sea. Just kidding (sort-of). Tony .

Where did ICM enter the equation? This is a suggestion about HK Models, aka Hong Kong Models, who have already produced B-17s and Lancasters in 1:32 scale. Watch out, because you may get unexpectedly pooped on by a pig flying in reverse. Tony

Dunno. Want one though. The front windshield is about 5mm too long (correct for the 2-seater D but not right for the single-seater C). I'm not sure it'll bother me excessively, especially after making the front 2mm or so of windshield blended into the fuselage and painted as such. There are some great builds on LSP, like Spiro's Greek one. Tony

Hannants already are as Future Releases. Tony

I have vague memories of Microscale markings for a 388th TFW Block 1 F-16A from Hill AFB, Utah. It would have had a black radome circa 1978-79, quickly superseded by the less conspicuous grey coating. But maybe the scale was 1:48. If it were me I'd search for black codes, serials from generic 1980s F-16C sheets, coloured 388th TFW & TAC insignia from wherever. Tony

Over on the Britmodeller Rmour Thread... https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/235139234-hk-132-halifax-and-sunderland/ Tony

The earliest I could find was for a Block 15 AFRes jet: https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/SS32205?result-token=Lx33E Microscale must have done some back in the day for early Hill and Nellis aircraft, so trawling ebay etc might turn up something. Tony